158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
+14
Shingle
vee8
christabel
janeGT
Mandz
Rosie
kateno.51
maria
zenandpeace
littleminx
dianeh
Tinkerbell43
clairesy
calcite51
18 posters
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Hi RealRhodes
Excellent question and one you have to wonder about. How can he, treat Madeleine like a cash cow to top up his retirement fund?
I'll make sure that goes in when I re work the questions.
Welcome to the forum Look forward to reading more of your posts.
Stll, lardy boy's time is nearly up he is going for trial next week I hear. (Hope he gets his!)
Rosie
I'll make sure that goes in when I re work the questions.
Welcome to the forum Look forward to reading more of your posts.
Stll, lardy boy's time is nearly up he is going for trial next week I hear. (Hope he gets his!)
Rosie
Rosie- Admin
- Number of posts : 4358
Registration date : 2008-04-27
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
Shame on you Gonçalo Amaral. :twisted:
Pedro Silva- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 5592
Location : Portugal
Registration date : 2008-10-20
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
Shame on you Tony Bennett :twisted:
Pedro Silva- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 5592
Location : Portugal
Registration date : 2008-10-20
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
I just came across this and it is a comment made by Amarel......
The PJ should worry about defending its professionals, respecting the principle of presumed innocence, and stop summoning inspectors for festive events.
That brings another question to ask him, why has he no respect for the principle of presumed innocent?
The PJ should worry about defending its professionals, respecting the principle of presumed innocence, and stop summoning inspectors for festive events.
That brings another question to ask him, why has he no respect for the principle of presumed innocent?
Shingle- Rookie
- Number of posts : 74
Registration date : 2008-05-23
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
To be honest the question i think id like to ask him right now is simply...
You don't hold the answers yourself to this case because if you did then Madeleine would have been found by now,we would know what happened to her and the person/s responsible would be arrested.So with no leads,no evidence and no information why are you and why were you not interested in following up reports and complaints about the investigation when you got them?
After all if you were the top dog on the case wouldn't it concern you if someone felt your team weren't investigating something properly?
would it not have excited you that someone as called in with a possible sighting of a missing child?with a possible break through to the case?
Why ignore all the leads and calls you got, instead choosing to follow your gut feeling when that evidence and those new leads pointed you in other directions?
You don't hold the answers yourself to this case because if you did then Madeleine would have been found by now,we would know what happened to her and the person/s responsible would be arrested.So with no leads,no evidence and no information why are you and why were you not interested in following up reports and complaints about the investigation when you got them?
After all if you were the top dog on the case wouldn't it concern you if someone felt your team weren't investigating something properly?
would it not have excited you that someone as called in with a possible sighting of a missing child?with a possible break through to the case?
Why ignore all the leads and calls you got, instead choosing to follow your gut feeling when that evidence and those new leads pointed you in other directions?
clairesy- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 2698
Age : 39
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-06-04
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
clairesy wrote:To be honest the question i think id like to ask him right now is simply...
You don't hold the answers yourself to this case because if you did then Madeleine would have been found by now,we would know what happened to her and the person/s responsible would be arrested.So with no leads,no evidence and no information why are you and why were you not interested in following up reports and complaints about the investigation when you got them?
After all if you were the top dog on the case wouldn't it concern you if someone felt your team weren't investigating something properly?
would it not have excited you that someone as called in with a possible sighting of a missing child?with a possible break through to the case?
Why ignore all the leads and calls you got, instead choosing to follow your gut feeling when that evidence and those new leads pointed you in other directions?
adding another two questions to those:
Is it because you knew all along what happened to Madeleine and who took her?
Was there a reason for you to lead the investigation in another direction?
jackf- Rookie
- Number of posts : 97
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-08-06
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
Hi jackf,
And will he answer them whilst being plugged in to a lie detector test??
id love to strap him to a lie detector,and why not after all hes been moved from the case,hes proven he is incompetent,so lets know WHY??
And will he answer them whilst being plugged in to a lie detector test??
id love to strap him to a lie detector,and why not after all hes been moved from the case,hes proven he is incompetent,so lets know WHY??
clairesy- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 2698
Age : 39
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-06-04
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
jackf wrote:clairesy wrote:To be honest the question i think id like to ask him right now is simply...
You don't hold the answers yourself to this case because if you did then Madeleine would have been found by now,we would know what happened to her and the person/s responsible would be arrested.So with no leads,no evidence and no information why are you and why were you not interested in following up reports and complaints about the investigation when you got them?
After all if you were the top dog on the case wouldn't it concern you if someone felt your team weren't investigating something properly?
would it not have excited you that someone as called in with a possible sighting of a missing child?with a possible break through to the case?
Why ignore all the leads and calls you got, instead choosing to follow your gut feeling when that evidence and those new leads pointed you in other directions?
adding another two questions to those:
Is it because you knew all along what happened to Madeleine and who took her?
Was there a reason for you to lead the investigation in another direction?
Three words Jak......
"In a nutshell"!
Rosie- Admin
- Number of posts : 4358
Registration date : 2008-04-27
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
clairesy wrote:Hi jackf,
And will he answer them whilst being plugged in to a lie detector test??
id love to strap him to a lie detector,and why not after all hes been moved from the case,hes proven he is incompetent,so lets know WHY??
I'd love to plug him into The National Grid, but I don't think it's allowed.
Sabot- Star Poster
- Number of posts : 764
Location : France
Registration date : 2009-10-25
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
Sabot wrote:clairesy wrote:Hi jackf,
And will he answer them whilst being plugged in to a lie detector test??
id love to strap him to a lie detector,and why not after all hes been moved from the case,hes proven he is incompetent,so lets know WHY??
I'd love to plug him into The National Grid, but I don't think it's allowed.
Hi clairesy.
Can I pull the supercharge switch.
jackf- Rookie
- Number of posts : 97
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-08-06
Re: 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
Rosiepops wrote:jackf wrote:clairesy wrote:To be honest the question i think id like to ask him right now is simply...
You don't hold the answers yourself to this case because if you did then Madeleine would have been found by now,we would know what happened to her and the person/s responsible would be arrested.So with no leads,no evidence and no information why are you and why were you not interested in following up reports and complaints about the investigation when you got them?
After all if you were the top dog on the case wouldn't it concern you if someone felt your team weren't investigating something properly?
would it not have excited you that someone as called in with a possible sighting of a missing child?with a possible break through to the case?
Why ignore all the leads and calls you got, instead choosing to follow your gut feeling when that evidence and those new leads pointed you in other directions?
adding another two questions to those:
Is it because you knew all along what happened to Madeleine and who took her?
Was there a reason for you to lead the investigation in another direction?
Three words Jak......
"In a nutshell"!
I can't wait for that b****** to get what he deserves, it's long long overdue.
I'd like to ask him where he got the money from to pay for his new home despite saying that he has nothing and trying to get Legal Aid.
jackf- Rookie
- Number of posts : 97
Location : uk
Registration date : 2008-08-06
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» QUESTIONS FOR AMARAL WHEN HE IS ARRESTED
» Questions we would like to ask Goncalo Amaral Regarding The Cipriano Case.
» THE SUSPECT WHO ASKED TOO MANY QUESTIONS/MURAT/DAILY MAIL
» The mistakes made by Goncalo Amaral and his team of investigators (Dedicated to Clawdia and her pro pj blog)
» Madeleine Hunt Targets New Murder Suspect
» Questions we would like to ask Goncalo Amaral Regarding The Cipriano Case.
» THE SUSPECT WHO ASKED TOO MANY QUESTIONS/MURAT/DAILY MAIL
» The mistakes made by Goncalo Amaral and his team of investigators (Dedicated to Clawdia and her pro pj blog)
» Madeleine Hunt Targets New Murder Suspect
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|