Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
+2
Catkins
christabel
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Court of Faro
Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and university professor António Pedro Dores begin this Wednesday to be tried by the Court of Faro, for alleged defamation of a former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral, after two postponements of the first court session.
The former inspector, who investigated the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano sued both by aludirem publicly that the alleged torture that was targeted during an interrogation.
Aragão Correia, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, argues that courts have already found as a fact that his client was tortured, although the prosecution maintained the charge in libel suit that has Gonçalo Amaral as the complainant. Remember that, in the case of alleged torture of Leonor Cipriano, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted for the crime of false testimony, one year and six months imprisonment, suspended for the same period.
Marcos Aragão Correia enrolled as defense witnesses the current Chairman of the Lawyers, Antonio Marinho Pinto, and former director of the Prison Odemira Ana Maria Calado. The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED).
On March 29, the court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral has requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process. Absent such a session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lived in Funchal, which have made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and university professor António Pedro Dores begin this Wednesday to be tried by the Court of Faro, for alleged defamation of a former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral, after two postponements of the first court session.
The former inspector, who investigated the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano sued both by aludirem publicly that the alleged torture that was targeted during an interrogation.
Aragão Correia, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, argues that courts have already found as a fact that his client was tortured, although the prosecution maintained the charge in libel suit that has Gonçalo Amaral as the complainant. Remember that, in the case of alleged torture of Leonor Cipriano, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted for the crime of false testimony, one year and six months imprisonment, suspended for the same period.
Marcos Aragão Correia enrolled as defense witnesses the current Chairman of the Lawyers, Antonio Marinho Pinto, and former director of the Prison Odemira Ana Maria Calado. The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED).
On March 29, the court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral has requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process. Absent such a session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lived in Funchal, which have made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Gonçalo Amaral in court
Trial for alleged defamation without 2 players
by LusaToday
The trial for alleged defamation of Gonçalo Amaral began today in the Court of Faro, after being postponed twice, without the presence of former Inspector of Judicial Police and the attorney and defendant Marcos Aragão Correia.
The lawyer and university professor Aragão Correia António Pedro Dores are accused of allegedly defaming the former inspector, who investigated for nearly eight years the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano.
Gonçalo Amaral, in accordance with the court refused to give his address, sued both by the public aludirem alleged torture of Leonor Cipriano who have been targeted during an interrogation.
At its meeting scheduled for today, attended one of the defendants, Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED).
According to the court, Gonçalo Amaral refused to provide their address, home indicating how the Police station Olivais in Lisbon.
The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores.
The March 29, the court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral has requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process.
Absent such a session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lived in Funchal, which have made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=2427532
Trial for alleged defamation without 2 players
by LusaToday
The trial for alleged defamation of Gonçalo Amaral began today in the Court of Faro, after being postponed twice, without the presence of former Inspector of Judicial Police and the attorney and defendant Marcos Aragão Correia.
The lawyer and university professor Aragão Correia António Pedro Dores are accused of allegedly defaming the former inspector, who investigated for nearly eight years the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano.
Gonçalo Amaral, in accordance with the court refused to give his address, sued both by the public aludirem alleged torture of Leonor Cipriano who have been targeted during an interrogation.
At its meeting scheduled for today, attended one of the defendants, Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED).
According to the court, Gonçalo Amaral refused to provide their address, home indicating how the Police station Olivais in Lisbon.
The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores.
The March 29, the court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral has requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process.
Absent such a session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lived in Funchal, which have made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=2427532
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Eh ? How can he refuse to give his address?
And can you defame a character such as him?
And can you defame a character such as him?
Catkins- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 1829
Location : UK
Registration date : 2009-02-11
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
gonçalo amaral defamed himself with his despicable behaviour, which we know too well.
Pedro Silva- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 5592
Location : Portugal
Registration date : 2008-10-20
Gonçalo Amaral and Aragão Correia fail judgment
Gonçalo Amaral and Aragão Correia fail judgment
Initiation of proceedings had been postponed twice
By: Editor / CBA | 18 - 4 - 2012 16: 26
The lawyer and defendant Aragão Correia, accused of alleged defamation of Gonçalo Amaral, former Inspector of Judicial Police, there was present, this Wednesday, the Court of Faro, as well as the complainant himself.
According to Lusa, after two postponements of the first court session, attended only one of the defendants, Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED). lawyer Aragão Correia and António Pedro Dores are accused of allegedly defaming the former Inspector, who investigated for nearly eight years the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano and aludirem publicly alleged torture, that it would have been targeted during an interrogation.
According to the court, Gonçalo Amaral refused to provide your address, indicating how the home Olivais Police station in Lisbon. The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores.
On 29 March, court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral was requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process. Absent this session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lives in Funchal, who has made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/sociedade/tribunal-processo-difamacao-sociedade-ultimas-noticias-tvi24/1341884-4071.html
It seems Gonc was criticised by the Court as he lied about his address
Court Date now 2/05/2012
Initiation of proceedings had been postponed twice
By: Editor / CBA | 18 - 4 - 2012 16: 26
The lawyer and defendant Aragão Correia, accused of alleged defamation of Gonçalo Amaral, former Inspector of Judicial Police, there was present, this Wednesday, the Court of Faro, as well as the complainant himself.
According to Lusa, after two postponements of the first court session, attended only one of the defendants, Antonio Pedro Dores, professor and chair of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED). lawyer Aragão Correia and António Pedro Dores are accused of allegedly defaming the former Inspector, who investigated for nearly eight years the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Leonor Cipriano and aludirem publicly alleged torture, that it would have been targeted during an interrogation.
According to the court, Gonçalo Amaral refused to provide your address, indicating how the home Olivais Police station in Lisbon. The trial should have started in February but was postponed to March 29 because of a pending appeal, brought by Antonio Pedro Dores.
On 29 March, court again postponed the initial session for today, by Gonçalo Amaral was requested to be heard through videoconferencing, according to the explanation advanced in time by one of the lawyers involved in the process. Absent this session was also the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, who lives in Funchal, who has made the same application to the Court of Faro, forcing the trial to be postponed for the second time.
http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/sociedade/tribunal-processo-difamacao-sociedade-ultimas-noticias-tvi24/1341884-4071.html
It seems Gonc was criticised by the Court as he lied about his address
Court Date now 2/05/2012
Last edited by christabel on Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:15 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : To move my comment to under link.)
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
One would think that failing to provide a correct address would be contempt of court.
As for defamation. In our legal system (as in all those descended from the British system), defamation can only occur if damages result. So if you are a convicted for perjury, it is doubtful that you would be successful in a libel claim when it concerns the case you lost. But Portugal is different, and I thought that this was some sort of criminal libel case, which we have no equivalent of. Libel/defamation is only a civil action in our legal system(s).
Need to add that it is a criminal action if the one being libelled is the govt. In other words it is criminal to defame the govt, not the politicians but govt depts, heads of depts etc. I am not sure if the criminal tag applies when someone defames a politician, as they do it to each other all the time.
As for defamation. In our legal system (as in all those descended from the British system), defamation can only occur if damages result. So if you are a convicted for perjury, it is doubtful that you would be successful in a libel claim when it concerns the case you lost. But Portugal is different, and I thought that this was some sort of criminal libel case, which we have no equivalent of. Libel/defamation is only a civil action in our legal system(s).
Need to add that it is a criminal action if the one being libelled is the govt. In other words it is criminal to defame the govt, not the politicians but govt depts, heads of depts etc. I am not sure if the criminal tag applies when someone defames a politician, as they do it to each other all the time.
dianeh- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 3465
Age : 60
Location : Outback, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-27
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Oh no, It is even worse than we thought!
Amaral was contacted by a policeman - for sure at his home, now at Olivais, Lisbon. But apparently because of the trial in the Algarve he asked this policeman to inform that he didn’t want to reveal his address, but, anyway, the court could always send the notifications to the Police Station/Olivais, under the responsibility of the “Intendente Lopes Martins” (“Intendente” is a police – PSP - patent).
Isabel Duarte asked the court to issue a certification, in order to communicate this fact to the High Command of the PSP and to open an inquiry. Which she will do.
Amaral was contacted by a policeman - for sure at his home, now at Olivais, Lisbon. But apparently because of the trial in the Algarve he asked this policeman to inform that he didn’t want to reveal his address, but, anyway, the court could always send the notifications to the Police Station/Olivais, under the responsibility of the “Intendente Lopes Martins” (“Intendente” is a police – PSP - patent).
Isabel Duarte asked the court to issue a certification, in order to communicate this fact to the High Command of the PSP and to open an inquiry. Which she will do.
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
He is no longer in the PJ.....why would he be giving a copshop as his address.......
GGRR These goons think that they can walk on water.........
GGRR These goons think that they can walk on water.........
Catkins- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 1829
Location : UK
Registration date : 2009-02-11
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Catkins wrote:He is no longer in the PJ.....why would he be giving a copshop as his address.......
GGRR These goons think that they can walk on water.........
Well he can try and hide Cat, but even I know where he lives
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
christabel wrote:Catkins wrote:He is no longer in the PJ.....why would he be giving a copshop as his address.......
GGRR These goons think that they can walk on water.........
Well he can try and hide Cat, but even I know where he lives
Can I share this news on Myths?
Catkins- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 1829
Location : UK
Registration date : 2009-02-11
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
OMG, it just gets better!!
Gonçalo Amaral missing on trial for alleged defamation.
Seems he didn't show for his videoconferencing, and he was nowhere near the police station
He only told a policeman,the court could always send the notifications to the Police Station/Olivais.
The court tried to contact Gonc by phone and he had the phone disconnected all day. Besides that, the court doesn’t know where he lives, and therefore, doesn’t know to where the court can send the notifications.
The judge determined there should be a deep investigation about the concrete Amaral domicile, to inform the court.
In other words the court wants Gonc's actual residence address!!
Gonçalo Amaral missing on trial for alleged defamation.
Seems he didn't show for his videoconferencing, and he was nowhere near the police station
He only told a policeman,the court could always send the notifications to the Police Station/Olivais.
The court tried to contact Gonc by phone and he had the phone disconnected all day. Besides that, the court doesn’t know where he lives, and therefore, doesn’t know to where the court can send the notifications.
The judge determined there should be a deep investigation about the concrete Amaral domicile, to inform the court.
In other words the court wants Gonc's actual residence address!!
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Running Scared, is he? I would think he should be. He cannot possibly win this one, unless The Portuguese Judiciary want to make fools of themselves yet again.
But who knows with the Fascist Regime that appears to have been running the show since The Glorious Revolution.
One wonders if Portugal is actually prepared to expose these people.
Sabot- Star Poster
- Number of posts : 764
Location : France
Registration date : 2009-10-25
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
Apparently he's living with his Father.........
Catkins- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 1829
Location : UK
Registration date : 2009-02-11
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
What the fuss??? This is getting stranger every day.
Where is Amaral's lawyer in all this????
Strange, Court phoning Amaral....: "Your trial started, where are you?
Even send a cop over.
Where is the professional distance ...??? The objectivity.
Surely the Court should take this up with Amaral's lawyer???
Where is Amaral's lawyer in all this????
Strange, Court phoning Amaral....: "Your trial started, where are you?
Even send a cop over.
Where is the professional distance ...??? The objectivity.
Surely the Court should take this up with Amaral's lawyer???
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
He probably doesn't have a lawyer Chic.
After all nobody wants to touch him with a bargepole, and who can blame them.
He's probably tied up somewhere, in one of Cristoava's cupboards
After all nobody wants to touch him with a bargepole, and who can blame them.
He's probably tied up somewhere, in one of Cristoava's cupboards
christabel- Admin
- Number of posts : 1637
Age : 74
Location : OK
Registration date : 2008-04-26
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
if by chance someone has come across with him, it is best to use antiseptic disinfectant or gloves, or even a mask to protect nose and mouth from germs.
Pedro Silva- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 5592
Location : Portugal
Registration date : 2008-10-20
Re: Defamation of Gonçalo Amaral begins to be judged
This is just plain weird.
Is it contempt of court to fail to turn up to a court when you are required? And even weirder is that it is Gonc's action.
Is it contempt of court to fail to turn up to a court when you are required? And even weirder is that it is Gonc's action.
dianeh- Grand Member
- Number of posts : 3465
Age : 60
Location : Outback, Australia
Registration date : 2008-04-27
Similar topics
» Postponed the trial for defamation of Gonçalo Amaral
» trial against gonçalo amaral
» 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
» Dr Who and Goncalo Amaral. The comparison ...
» Goncalo Amaral Part One
» trial against gonçalo amaral
» 158 Questions We Would Like To Ask Goncalo Amaral
» Dr Who and Goncalo Amaral. The comparison ...
» Goncalo Amaral Part One
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|