Re: McCanns NEW PETITON

by Tinkerbell43 Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:29 pm

maria wrote:Not only the press, RTP (yesterday evening news) as well.

Thanks Maria & Pedro.

by Catkins Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:10 pm

[b]16837 and rising..... woohoo

by Tinkerbell43 Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:28 am

19100

by Pedro Silva Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:02 am

The more the better. Tinks my friend, you welcome.

by rosemary Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:38 am

Can someone tell me why some people are recommending signing their signatures multiple times? They will get filtered out by the Petition site - it says this in FAQ´s. It is against the rules of the Petition.

by Catkins Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:14 am

rosemary wrote:Can someone tell me why some people are recommending signing their signatures multiple times? They will get filtered out by the Petition site - it says this in FAQ´s. It is against the rules of the Petition.

Rosemary ...where did you read this?

by Catkins Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:15 am

The numbers moving issue, is because of the deleting mainly of duplicate posts, going on. Continual adjustments have to be made for the spammers and removal of duplicates.
I dont know if that helped explain anything, but it's under control

Via someone who knows...

by rosemary Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:40 am

Yes Cat it was about spamming I read it somewhere on PFA2 but can´t find it now. Good to know though that the petition is so well administered it won´t get past them or spoil the petition.

by Tinkerbell43 Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:44 am

22,200! I'll sleep well tonight.

by Catkins Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 pm

[b]23,319.... cheerleaders

by calcite51 Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:25 pm

Signed.

by rosemary Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:05 am

http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/

FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES!!!!!!! click on K&G....

by rosemary Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:28 am

I read that a John Maccann (!!!) believes the Petition is worth less than a ten bob note because it allows anonymous signatures with false emails! I did email the site admin but am pretty sure it cannot get past their admin. Will report if I get a reply. banghead

by Tinkerbell43 Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:15 am

24,000! This just keeps getting better and better.

To anyone reading that hasn't signed yet, Madeleine needs your signature. Please sign and give her a fighting chance to be found.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/signatures.

by Pedro Silva Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:50 am

The more signatures the better.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/

24,670 signatures, the more the better.

by Peaceful1 Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:50 am

Already signed.
I believe the anti's are not happy - why? Thought this is what they wanted?
But then again, it is really showing their TRUE colours and motives now eh? LOL
Which makes me ask the question AGAIN - Why do they not want Madeleine found??

by Pedro Silva Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:58 pm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1326470/Madeleine-McCann-petition-force-review-British-Portuguese-signed-9k.html

by Catkins Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:25 pm

[b]24977....slowing a little - lets hope it picks up speed again.....

by rosemary Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:49 pm

As Clarence said in the Mercury, it will stay online gathering signatures until the Home Office takes some action!

by Tinkerbell43 Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:31 pm

Keep spreading the word everyone. Lets hope the Sundays give it another big push.

I've found people are only too pleased to help. It really has restored some of my faith in human nature.

by Pedro Silva Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:58 pm

My friends, according to PFA2: "It's broken the 25,000 mark
25027 to be precise". The more signatures the better. Yes, I also agree with Mr. Mitchell´s words. I agree with you Tinkerbell.

by Pedro Silva Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:28 am

25,800 signatures, according PFA2. The more signatures the better.

by Zavvi Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:20 am

Tomorrow's front page of Sunday Express

McCanns NEW PETITON - Page 2 15796417

by Tinkerbell43 Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:35 am

Zavvi wrote:Tomorrow's front page of Sunday Express

Thank you Zavvi, lets just hope its not followed by some "Fluffy" words.

by Pedro Silva Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:32 pm

Yes, I agree with you Tinkerbell, focussing on a living child.

by Sponsored content