3arguido's now openly support paedophiles.

From the hounding of the McCann's blog,
The 3A' forum is now expressing sympathy for the depraved paedophile above. Which proves, anyone associated with this site, has relinquished their soul to the Devil.

The members have posted vile pornographic pictures, called the poor missing child Madeleine McCann a tart and now, has sympathy for a depraved paedophile.

Indeed, they are the epitome of true evil and have earned the right to reside in the bowels of hell!
***************************************************
NeverPebbles Post subject: Re: MADDIE SUSPECT: I'LL TAKE LIE TESTPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:31 am

Mafia Boss

"Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:44 pm
Posts: 2005 Am I the only one who's beginning to feel extremely sorry for this man? For heaven's sake, he's dying! The more I read the more I hate the McCanns and Mr Mitchell. I hope the German doctors and nurses will continue to protect Hewlett."
******************************************************
Not a God Darn Thought For The Victims Of This Man! Two little girls eight and nine years old respectively suffered every parents worse nightmare at the hands of this man, but the 3A' have sympathy only for the paedophile who carried out the vile deeds.
A 14 year old girl had a gun held to her head whilst this demon raped her, but the 3A' feel sorry for him. A twelve year old female child whose life will never be the same again because of being raped by Hewlett, but the 3A' have little sympathy for her. Their sympathy only stretches as far as Hewlett......Tell me again 3A' how you are the voice of a little 6 year old child.....Sick Baastards!!!


Taken From MuratFan Blog...A Comment.



They are nothing but a bunch of thick paedophiles.

They so badly want Madeleine NOT to be found that they defend paedophiles because they think he is dying!

Forget that this man has raped an 8 year old girl, abducted and raped another and has a whole vile string of offences against children. Nope that doesn't come into it, somehow it is Clarence Mitchell's fault because at least 3 UK police forces want to interview over serious matters concerning CHILDREN.

You know CHILDREN you heartless load of tossers.

They are probably all over on the 3as now praying that this man will die before the police can interview him, just as they were all praying the other day for a convicted liar to get off of his crimes of perjury and falsifying documents concealing a torture of a witness in custody!
Sod that this man may possibly hold information that may lead to the discovery of Madeleine McCann and sod that he may also hold vital information about an 11 year old little girl stabbed 12 times and raped.

You bunch of sad sick twisted perverts and kiddie fiddler hiders.

That comes from the site that professes to be "The Voice of Madeleine"

Owned and run by Brenda Ryan, modded by Dr Vanessa Sluming of Liverpool University and Chrissie Nyssen of Aberdeen College.

This is what our tax pays for for people, six sad bitter and twisted porno queens like these.

The 3 arguidos where truth runs freely and advertises and so is supported by child porn sites.

The site that thinks it is OK to have a picture of a man raping a child sent to someone through the post.

24 May 2009 16:26http://muratandco.blogspot.com/

If those perverts DO organise any kind of march, then WE need to be there, with camera's, taking pictures, so we all know exactly who to keep our own kids away from. And those pictures need to be circulated on the net, so other people know also. These supporters of paedophiles could be your neighbour.

I know that feelings run high when we see things like this, but I honestly think these people are just so blinded by their hatred for the McCanns that they are losing all objectivity. At the end of the day, if and when they are proven wrong about the McCanns, they will have to face up to what they have done to them, and I think that is something they fear more than anything.

I understand what you're saying, but surely to God there must be a tiny voice somewhere in the back of their head, saying, 'Hang on, what have I just done? Did I mean to say that?' I know most of them are rotton to the core, but even they must have a limit, surely?

It is unbelievable that anyone could support a known paedophile, who has abducted and raped little children and who is wanted for questioning in connection to the murder of another little girl.

I believe in innocent until proven guilty, but this man is a convicted paedophile, and whether or not he has any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance is irrelevant. He is a convicted paedophile and is classified as dangerous by the British police (if the press reports are accurate). He doesnt deserve my compassion, nor anyone else's.

Anyone supporting him, in any way, and I include his family in this, is supporting a paedophile. If they want to be known as supporting a known, convicted paedophile, then it is obvious that they are not concerned with the safety and welfare of children. Their actions speak louder than any claims to the contrary.

The 3A's members seem to forget that this man is wanted for questioning by three different police forces, does this not tell them something about him.

I dont know if he was involved with Madeleine's disappearance or not. But I hope that he is able to be questioned and that he tells what he knows before he dies, concerning Madeleine, the little girl he is suspected of murdering and the death of his son, and any other children he may have hurt over the years.

My understanding is that his own family is NOT supporting him - his children went through hell having this man as a father.

Some members on 3A's are so filled with hatred of the McCanns that they'll do ANYTHING including supporting a paedophile.

dianeh wrote:It is unbelievable that anyone could support a known paedophile, who has abducted and raped little children and who is wanted for questioning in connection to the murder of another little girl.

I believe in innocent until proven guilty, but this man is a convicted paedophile, and whether or not he has any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance is irrelevant. He is a convicted paedophile and is classified as dangerous by the British police (if the press reports are accurate). He doesnt deserve my compassion, nor anyone else's.

Anyone supporting him, in any way, and I include his family in this, is supporting a paedophile. If they want to be known as supporting a known, convicted paedophile, then it is obvious that they are not concerned with the safety and welfare of children. Their actions speak louder than any claims to the contrary.

The 3A's members seem to forget that this man is wanted for questioning by three different police forces, does this not tell them something about him.

I dont know if he was involved with Madeleine's disappearance or not. But I hope that he is able to be questioned and that he tells what he knows before he dies, concerning Madeleine, the little girl he is suspected of murdering and the death of his son, and any other children he may have hurt over the years.

What I can't understand is how the 3A's forum is still operational. Surely CEOP should be informed now that they are supporting paedophiles, and they should be investigated and stopped. You never know CEOP may find out something that interests them!!

Calcite

I dont mean his family in Britain, who have disowned him, but his wife/partner in Germany.

She may believe he has changed, but ?????

Oops, sorry, you mean the girlfriend that looks like Kate. Isn`t it weird that these animals still have people supporting him. I read too somewhere, that the girlfriend lives in an areas of schools, playgrounds, etc. and she has children herself. Why would anyone jeopardize their children by having a relationship with a paedophile.

dianeh wrote:Calcite

I dont mean his family in Britain, who have disowned him, but his wife/partner in Germany.

She may believe he has changed, but ?????

I think he is the kids' father. Err, imagine having a paedophile for a father.

I hope that British Social Services takes a good hard look at this woman, and makes sure the kids are being raised properly.

When I read the article and the statement by the Thompsons, i thought how could they have known them, saw that the children didnt go to school, had no toys and couldnt even talk properly, and did nothing about it.

I would have reported them.

Hopefully, Children Services has concerns about the children and will investigate now.

I dont know how it works in Europe, can Britain request that the children be seen by Social Services in Germany, being that the kids have a British father. Or is it just up to Germany?

Does anyone have any idea?

Here are some comments by people who defend paedophiles:

Ratonthebeam: So Pinkie tried to fit up some poor old dying paedo, saw that it wasn't going to work, and now he is trying to squirm out of it. In a couple of days they will have "discounted" Mr Hewlett.

My Gawd, how evil can some people get. They will all roast in their Hell forever for this.

Angel: Mr Hewlett, on his deathbed, shows Madeleine respect by being willing to take a lie detector test to prove he is not the individual involved in her disappearance.

NeverPebbles: Am I the only one who's beginning to feel extremely sorry for this man? For heaven's sake, he's dying! The more I read the more I hate the McCanns and Mr Mitchell. I hope the German doctors and nurses will continue to protect Hewlett.

Lilemor: Never Pebbles,
I am with you. I think the doctores and nurses will continue to protect Mr. H.

I hope that the German authorities will have a close look into the Madeleine case...
Now, that they are in one or another way involved...

MrsMop: I have not been on for a while and have some catching up to do. This guy seems to be a pretty unpleasant character, but I do think he is a convenient patsy at the moment. It cannot be right to hound someone in his condition without reason.

Just wondering whether ( if he should die) he wife would be able to sue for defamation, libel, etc. After all she has a number of children to rear and no Fund. Sorry looking for something to cheer us up after the copious quantities of rubbish we have been fed this weekend by the fine British Press!! Would love to see the McScammers paying her.

autumn: What rights do the 'family investigators' have to speak to Hewlitt, surely this would be a matter for the REAL police if deemed necessary? In my opinion, the 'pretend' investigators are walking on thin ice, they have no authority whatsoever to talk to this man - any attempt to do so should be classed as intimidation/ harrassment, I would have thought.

answersplease: That piece is cr@p even for the People. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Attacks on children. Overlooking a kindergarten. Oooooh, that MUST be him then! Subliminal reporting for those who are so thick they read the People and don't understand the difference between an offender who likes TEENAGE girls and one who likes little kids.

Does the People also have picturs of topless teenage girls? Because it's sister paper, the Sun, does.

Sheesh.

Groom1: The Brit hacks are too fat and lazy to get off their backsides a do a proper job. They can't spell or string a sentence together - let along get their facts correct. They don't even seem to have examined the evidential DVD - they simply print Clazzettittattatta Mitchellitis's cr*p whenever it spews forth.

I hope Raymond Hewlett (if he is well enough) challenges the McScum's to take a lie detector test - and not one they organise, for one can't trust that pair further than one can throw them.

I won't hold my breath - they wouldn't D A R E take an independently verified lie detector test.

"Just wondering whether ( if he should die) he wife would be able to sue for defamation, libel, etc."

In a word, not a snowflake's chance in hell. Firstly, the McCann's never defamed him. He IS a convicted Paedo, proven. All anyone has done is ask to interview him, in regards to SEVERAL still open cases, Madeleine's being just one.

"Subliminal reporting for those who are so thick they read the People and don't understand the difference between an offender who likes TEENAGE girls and one who likes little kids."


So holding a gun to a fourteen year old girl's head before raping her is somehow more acceptable than raping an eight year old is it? That's a good one.

"What rights do the 'family investigators' have to speak to Hewlitt, surely this would be a matter for the REAL police if deemed necessary? In my opinion, the 'pretend' investigators are walking on thin ice, they have no authority whatsoever to talk to this man - any attempt to do so should be classed as intimidation/ harrassment, I would have thought."

The 'Real' police are also wanting to question this man, or did you forget? And yes, private investigators DO have the right, given the correct court orders, to ask questions of a suspect. If the suspect refuses, then they can get 'Real' police do ask for them.


"I won't hold my breath - they wouldn't D A R E take an independently verified lie detector test."


COMPLETELY forgot that Kate herself asked to take a lie detector test once, did you? doesn't surprise me, since you obviosly have the attention span of an empty crisp packet.


"Does the People also have picturs of topless teenage girls? Because it's sister paper, the Sun, does."


Why? would you like to see pictures of a topless 13 year old?


"I hope that the German authorities will have a close look into the Madeleine case...
Now, that they are in one or another way involved..."

Well they couldn't do worse than a certain corrupt Portuguese cop, could they? Who know's, if this had all happened in germany, Madeleine may have been found within the first couple of days. German cops don't tend to take three hour booze fuelled lunchbreaks for a start.


" Mr Hewlett, on his deathbed, shows Madeleine respect by being willing to take a lie detector test to prove he is not the individual involved in her disappearance."


How much respect did he show his victims? Go on, answer that one.

"My Gawd, how evil can some people get. They will all roast in their Hell forever for this."


Oh yes sunshine, you will indeed roast in hell.

vee8 wrote:Here are some comments by people who defend paedophiles:

Ratonthebeam: So Pinkie tried to fit up some poor old dying paedo, saw that it wasn't going to work, and now he is trying to squirm out of it. In a couple of days they will have "discounted" Mr Hewlett.

My Gawd, how evil can some people get. They will all roast in their Hell forever for this.

Angel: Mr Hewlett, on his deathbed, shows Madeleine respect by being willing to take a lie detector test to prove he is not the individual involved in her disappearance.

NeverPebbles: Am I the only one who's beginning to feel extremely sorry for this man? For heaven's sake, he's dying! The more I read the more I hate the McCanns and Mr Mitchell. I hope the German doctors and nurses will continue to protect Hewlett.

Lilemor: Never Pebbles,
I am with you. I think the doctores and nurses will continue to protect Mr. H.

I hope that the German authorities will have a close look into the Madeleine case...
Now, that they are in one or another way involved...

MrsMop: I have not been on for a while and have some catching up to do. This guy seems to be a pretty unpleasant character, but I do think he is a convenient patsy at the moment. It cannot be right to hound someone in his condition without reason.

Just wondering whether ( if he should die) he wife would be able to sue for defamation, libel, etc. After all she has a number of children to rear and no Fund. Sorry looking for something to cheer us up after the copious quantities of rubbish we have been fed this weekend by the fine British Press!! Would love to see the McScammers paying her.

autumn: What rights do the 'family investigators' have to speak to Hewlitt, surely this would be a matter for the REAL police if deemed necessary? In my opinion, the 'pretend' investigators are walking on thin ice, they have no authority whatsoever to talk to this man - any attempt to do so should be classed as intimidation/ harrassment, I would have thought.

answersplease: That piece is cr@p even for the People. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Attacks on children. Overlooking a kindergarten. Oooooh, that MUST be him then! Subliminal reporting for those who are so thick they read the People and don't understand the difference between an offender who likes TEENAGE girls and one who likes little kids.

Does the People also have picturs of topless teenage girls? Because it's sister paper, the Sun, does.

Sheesh.

Groom1: The Brit hacks are too fat and lazy to get off their backsides a do a proper job. They can't spell or string a sentence together - let along get their facts correct. They don't even seem to have examined the evidential DVD - they simply print Clazzettittattatta Mitchellitis's cr*p whenever it spews forth.

I hope Raymond Hewlett (if he is well enough) challenges the McScum's to take a lie detector test - and not one they organise, for one can't trust that pair further than one can throw them.

I won't hold my breath - they wouldn't D A R E take an independently verified lie detector test.

Gawd, these people make me sick! Supporting pedo's and criminals......sitting pretty in their glass houses. Wait till their lives get shattered by one of these beasts, then what tune are they going to sing.

dianeh wrote:I dont know how it works in Europe, can Britain request that the children be seen by Social Services in Germany, being that the kids have a British father. Or is it just up to Germany?

Does anyone have any idea?

I think this would depend very much where they were born? He seems to have been on the run for a long time, it is my guess that perhaps the kiddies have been born in several different European countries. I would not even know how those concerned with children's welfare would begin to sort this one out!

MrsMop: I have not been on for a while and have some catching up to do. This guy seems to be a pretty unpleasant character, but I do think he is a convenient patsy at the moment. It cannot be right to hound someone in his condition without reason.

Without reason!! Jesus H. Christ on a bicycle, how many more reasons do you need to question this thing?! He was in the area, he knew his way around Praia de Luz, he knew which flat was Madeleine's, he went to Morocco on a profitable trip, he's a known serial paedophile,

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES YOU BRAIN-DEAD MORON!

''So Pinkie tried to fit up some poor old dying paedo,''

''Am I the only one who's beginning to feel extremely sorry for this man?''

''For heaven's sake, he's dying!''

''I hope the German doctors and nurses will continue to protect Hewlett''.

''It cannot be right to hound someone in his condition without reason''.

''Just wondering whether ( if he should die) he wife would be able to sue for defamation, libel, etc. ''

''Would love to see the McScammers paying her''

''they have no authority whatsoever to talk to this man - any attempt to do so should be classed as intimidation/ harrassment''

''Attacks on children. Overlooking a kindergarten. Oooooh, that MUST be him then!''

''for those who are so thick they read the People and don't understand the difference between an offender who likes TEENAGE girls and one who likes little kids.''

Firstly whats the difference between a offender who likes teenage girls and one who likes younger kids????imo none.they are all kids and whats more importantly they are all human and have feelings.So regardless of weather they be 6 14 of 40 they are all equal and none deserve to be attacked.There is no difference.Read the following....................written by the monster himself to his daughter.


"I do believe there is a God, there has to be something more than this wicked evil world, what I find hard to grasp is why me? Why when I've got everything I need why when I behave like any other normal person do I have to be destroyed? "What have I done that makes me have to pay over and over again, I still feel as though I've been singled out to be tramped on and stamped on like some bloody insect, tell me am I a human being or not?

Sounds like something one of his victims might want to say,or one of his poor kids who grew up with his violent outburst day in day out. Awwww feel sorry for him 3a's.........hes the poor old man dying....the one who said a 14 yer old girl was in control when he raped her,and that he just went along with it and she controlled the whole thing..........he aint no innocent poor old man who needs your pity,hes a sick twisted peado thats what he is.Maybe you should stand in his firing line next
time he gets the urge to lay his filthy rotten hands on another child again.Perhaps you would feel in control when he as your life in his hands and your on the deck with noone to help you.Maybe you will come back to the forum then and explain how you were in control and he was the poor old man. i actually feel sick reading that crap above,sounds like a squirming idiot who hurts people then knows exactly how they
feel so writes it to his daughter and pretends its his feelings when infact he knows its the way hes made others feel. Thats a scary thought.

Kate and gerrys adviser once told them not to cry or get emotional on tv during appeals because an abductor would get a kick out of seeing them hurting. Peadophiles and sex offenders are said to do what they do because they enjoys the whole power thing and control thing gives him a kick.In that letter there to his daughter and in the words he uses when he says how the teen girl was in control of the whole thing he appears to be doing just that........................reeling off the feelings he knows he as forced onto one of his victims as his own feelings.He knows exactly what hes doing.

I hope he rots in hell,and those on 3a.

''they have no authority whatsoever to talk to this man - any attempt to do so should be classed as intimidation/ harrassment''

intimidation and harassment?????? i aint even gonna comment on that ridiculous statement.Just goes to show the deluded minds of those on 3a site doesn't it.