'The English Gag' An Introduction.

From morearses blog.


The following text is the translation of the Preface to Gonçalo Amaral's new book, "The English Gag". Titled "Locard's Truth", the preface is authored by Francisco Moita Flores, a former Polícia Judiciária inspector, now the Mayor of Santarém, and a renowned criminologist and author.


Locard’s Truth

I read this outcry for freedom by Gonçalo Amaral at a time when the country wallows, and when I say the country, I say the politicians, some characters within the judiciary system supplying the pyrotechnical material for the fireworks that the media launch every day around the ‘Face Oculta’ process [major corruption scandal presently being investigated in Portugal]. And it is the greatest example of hypocrisy. Exactly the same newspapers, the same columnists, who in the name of respect for the parents’ «pain», in the name of respect for arguidos with no other coercion measure, practically imposed the end of any newscast about Maddie, they are exactly the same that, forgetting today what they had said yesterday, flog personalities from the areas of politics or economy with suspicions, half truths and hearsay, based on wiretaps that nobody knows, savagely destroying the character and honour of their targets.

Two weights and two measures. And now, after reading this painful, nostalgic, and yet brave book, following a temporary injunction against ‘Maddie – The Truth of the Lie’, accepted by a Portuguese court, I understand even better what I always understood: the McCann couple’s strategy, since the first day of their media folklore, never had any other purpose: to discredit the Portuguese Justice, the Portuguese Police, and, fundamentally, Gonçalo Amaral, the man who knew the most, and still does, about what they did. And what they didn’t.

Gonçalo Amaral is not a fictional character. He is the boldness of truth. He is the challenge of truth. Even if he doesn’t fully know it. He knows what nobody else does, about Maddie’s hidden destiny. And it’s no use to try to conceal the sun with a sieve, which seems to be the child’s parents’ only obsession, because like Sherlock Holmes invariably replied to his unavoidable friend Dr. Watson, the method of deduction, applied to facts, as long as they are seen in connection, becomes elementary, even for the most stupid living beings, that if action A produced result B, if result B is coherent with consequence C, then A is related to C. It is elementary! Aristotle formulated this reasoning in the shape of syllogisms, Edmond Locard, the father of modern criminal investigation, recovered it to become the instrument of all investigation police forces worldwide, and the results are there.

Even CSI, written under the shape of future fiction, evokes Locard. He is the true God of criminal investigation. Without exception. Be it for the Portuguese PJ, the FBI, the Scotland Yard. There is only one exception. It applies to all criminal cases except to the disappearance of Maddie. The exception. The divine exception which protects the parents to continue the farce. Since the beginning of the investigation. None of what has been explained by the hired «detectives», none of what is related to the reconstitution of facts, more or less proved, none of what is advanced by the «spin’s», hired journalists, protective political chains, manages to resist the implacable evidential logic of Edmond Locard. The instrument which Gonçalo Amaral used. Nothing escapes it. Neither the «moral» indignation, nor the silly piety, nor faith, nor propaganda, or any injunction, manages to trample over what life produces, as such, and Locard never ceased to be right. Just like Gonçalo Amaral. Just like all professional policemen who know, who are competent, who master the techniques of criminal investigation.

Gonçalo Amaral lives in the artlessness of the very best policemen. He believes that working so uninterestedly, in such an selfless way, where only the solution of the enigma matters, he didn’t pay attention to the dark manoeuvres, he didn’t realise that behind every column that was written against him, behind every indignant comment or editorial, behind every report that was serving the McCanns’ sieve, a current of sinister associations and complicities was organising itself, which had nothing to do with the material truth, or the investigation into the mysterious disappearance. The ingenuity of those who love their job and deliver themselves to their profession in an unconditional way.

Gonçalo Amaral never realised that nothing was done, apart from him and his team, to solve the case. On the contrary. Everything was done, from propaganda to commissioned detectives, to screw up his case. Nothing else mattered.

And one just has to look at the results. After all the silences, after all the interviews, after all the «reputed» detectives, after millions of euros, after the Pope’s blessing, and his negation, after so many words, squeezed to the last drop, that what has been advanced since the day that the process ended was zero. ZERO! That is to say, everything was done to shut up Gonçalo Amaral. Nothing was done to discover the truth. And the abduction theory, now the injunction, just like all the other pieces of this farce, had only one goal, just one: to tell the world that the little girl’s parents are saints and that the bad guy, the really bad guy, in this story is the policeman.

But Locard is right. Here and anywhere else in the world. And therefore, just like Galileo, Gonçalo Amaral is right. Even if it takes years (in Galileo’s case it took centuries) to demonstrate that he is right. Despite all mystifications, all insinuations, all calumnies, all injunctions, the truth, the only truth, that remains to be discovered is the time at which everything happened and the destiny that befell the pitiful child.

There is no inquisition, no censorship, no rhetoric, no ridiculous staging of shamelessly moralist and lying statements, no falsehoods, no little pieties that can violate Locard. The most cruel of all investigators. The one to whom the entire world owes the discovery of the method that became indifferent to witness statement or confession. The Truth is there, even if others persist, and sanction it, as a Lie. The world of material truth, taken from laboratories, pulled from Aristotle’s syllogisms, reconstructed with the methods of scientific police, has no pity for tears and no mercy for staging. Not even official censorship can silence what is built by life, the material testimonies, no matter how small, tear down the most staged and plentiful weeping.

It is certain that the process did not reach absolute conclusions. It is true. The formalism of the process imposes itself to the substance of evidence. But do not try to deceive yet another truth. Because it did not reach its end, but it went a long way. In another country, maybe it would have been enough for a condemnatory decision. Not here. There are no condemned. All are innocent. In the shape of law. Although those who carry out criminal investigations know that not a single law can change the entropy of life. Which is, after all, its greatest wealth which the poverty of norm never succeeds in capturing.

Who gave Moita Flores the right to criticize someone he were never been introduced? What or who gave him the right to say about things he were never inside of it? Who or what gave him the right to criticize those who are doing what Amaral should have done instead of gain fame and fortune at the expenses of innocents, who he betrayed, at the expenses of an innocent child, he also betrayed. The only one who has a strategy, media folkore, is Amaral, whose only concern is to try to conceal the sun with a sieve which is the main purpose of Amaral. We know what is the real obsession of Amaral, and it is not what you Moita Flores says or thinks about Amaral. Your´re so mistaken about Amaral, Moita Flores. You are watching too much CSI, that you Moita cannot separate fiction from reality. Moita Flores, show more respect for those who are doing what Amaral should have done, instead of gain fame and fortune using a disgusting way. So Moita Flores, with all do respect, go back to your city hall and stay there, and stop once and for all to criticize, to show disrespect for someone you do not know.

You are watching too much CSI, that you Moita cannot separate fiction from reality. Moita Flores, show more respect for those who are doing what Amaral should have done, instead of gain fame and fortune using a disgusting way. So Moita Flores, with all do respect, go back to your city hall and stay there, and stop once and for all to criticize, to show disrespect for someone you do not know.

BRAVO PEDRO!

I couldn't believe he referenced a Television SHOW! A fake show! Most of the stuff they do on there isn't possible and isn't real!

he didn’t pay attention to the dark manoeuvres, he didn’t realise that behind every column that was written against him, behind every indignant comment or editorial, behind every report that was serving the McCanns’ sieve, a current of sinister associations and complicities was organising itself,

Partly true, Amaral thought he could do as he pleased and it never occurred to him that anyone would oppose him. So he probably wasnt ready for the push back by the McCanns, as they hired help to try to find their daughter.

Had he not leaked all the bizarre and libellous things he did to the press (IMO he is behind most of the leaks, either personally or by condoning the actions of others) in an attempt to discredit the McCanns and hide the fact that his investigation was going no where, then there would have been no need for the McCanns to make any comments at all.

However, to believe that there was some vast conspiracy against Amaral is just a joke, the sign of a seriously deluded mind, of someone in denial of their own actions.

The title of the book should be

"ITS NOT MY FAULT".

Subtitled.

" I couldn't find Madeleine Mccann because a vast conspiracy of world governments, police organisations, religious organisations, bloggers and Team McCann stopped me from finding out the truth about Madeleine. I know she was not abducted and that her parents were behind her disappearance, and also everything else that has gone wrong in my life over the past 10 years"

Wanker.

Quote ......... 'He knows what nobody else does, about Maddie’s hidden destiny.'

Too right he does, he bloody well engineered it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Renowned criminologist? Renowned comentator, don't remember any 'big' crime he was able to crack down. Perhaps there were none on his time...

Author? Criminal author, but not that renowned, there are much much better known portuguese criminal authors than him (some use english pseudonyms'

Exactly the same newspapers, the same columnists, who in the name of respect for the parents’ «pain», in the name of respect for arguidos with no other coercion measure, practically imposed the end of any newscast about Maddie, they are exactly the same that, forgetting today what they had said yesterday, flog personalities from the areas of politics or economy with suspicions, half truths and hearsay, based on wiretaps that nobody knows, savagely destroying the character and honour of their targets.

TOTAL LIE. The papers, I would say the media, as TVI is included and JM as well, that 'flog personalities' are exactly the same that support Amaral, this gentleman is a finished liar.

And hopefully the author of faked PJ documents incriminating people, namely the Prime Minister, will be known and will probably be very close the others (or may be the same) who made the same thing in other high profile cases (including Madeleine in the first days?)

He proves, by his easily identifiable lies, that there is a political agenda behind these media and JM. As I and we have said all along.

I couldn't believe he referenced a Television SHOW! A fake show! Most of the stuff they do on there isn't possible and isn't real!

Except for IMMEDIATELY cordonning off the crime scene! Except for IMMEDIATELY aplying proper investigative rules! May be the rest is fictional, but THIS is a very educacional, and both Amaral and Moita Flores seem do not have watched. Perhaps they were systematically late for watching the beginning of the episode...

What or who gave him the right to say about things he were never inside of it?

Sorry Pedro, he was not inside it, but he had inside information. Remember, it was Moita Flores who coordinated the leaks in Casa Pia process (where he wasn't officially involved either) and passed it to Felícia Cabrita, who wisely distributed the bits and pieces around the different media. Felícia Cabrita had the very same 'task' in Madeleine's case. Who was pulling hers strings?

I wonder why such information was given to him, when he has not / had not no connection with this case.

Was it also moita flores who says one of the tapas 9 sneaked off in order to hide Madeleine's body.

He is the boldness of truth. He is the challenge of truth.

My derriere!

Pedro Silva wrote:I wonder why such information was given to him, when he has not / had not no connection with this case.

Pedro, this is of concern, and is one of my biggest concerns regards to the fat pig. Amaral never saw the case through to the end, there was still 9 months worth of investigative work after he was dismissed. To the best of my knowledge although some files have been released there is a good number that hasn't, so he cannot be quoting from the full files.

maria wrote:

What or who gave him the right to say about things he were never inside of it?

Sorry Pedro, he was not inside it, but he had inside information. Remember, it was Moita Flores who coordinated the leaks in Casa Pia process (where he wasn't officially involved either) and passed it to Felícia Cabrita, who wisely distributed the bits and pieces around the different media. Felícia Cabrita had the very same 'task' in Madeleine's case. Who was pulling hers strings?

There's been leaks in the Cipriano case also. Do you know if Cabrita reported on that investigation also? Did Moita Flores comment on that case too?

There's been several names that keep up appearing, over and over again. Is it really a coincidence?

Of course Moita Flores comments on Cipriano case!!! On the strongest terms, he and Anjos, the president of PJ union, very recently unleashed the vilest attack on Leonor (and Marcos, indirectly) on SIC morning talk show. And they repeat over and over again that the murder, the dismembering, etc was done at home after a scene of incest was discovered by Joana: it was proved in court, they keep repeating.

About Cabrita, I don't know, she might be busy then in Lisbon with other business.

Thanks again Maria.
Moita Flores, Anjos (he's been supporting GA too re Madeleine), Christovão, Cabrita, Sargento, Tavares de Almeida, João Grade and a few more names I can't remember at the moment. They all seem connected.
Are they all members of the same political party?

Locard’s Truth

By Locard's Truth, what does he mean? Locard's exchange theory regarding DNA? If he does, this is a seriously weird thing to invoke in this book of garbage, because this would totally disprove the so called evidence provided by the dogs that Amaral wants us to believe.
Locard's Exchange Theory, means that DNA can easily be transferred into a place where the neither the victim of assailant has ever been.

And to mention the CSI an American TV programme in defense of Amaral, is not only making an idiot out of the convicted criminal monkey Goncalo Amaral, it is making a complete p.rat out himself, Moita Flores "renowned criminologist"? What has Flores done that makes him renowned?

Moita Flores is just another monkey jumping on the bandwagon and pimping off of a missing child, hoping to make his name and fortune out of her.

Moita Flores you are just a s### of a man, the same as Amaral in fact you are both double s****.

I make no apologies for using that term, I cannot find another word that adequately describes people intent on using the life of an innocent child for their own ends, in my opinion, this makes both Flores and Amaral pimps of the worse kind possible.

Will Flores be so quick to align himself with a child trafficker I wonder?

By the way someone should tell Flores that the only person providing a pyrotechnical display, was Goncalo Amaral on his birthday, thousands of euros going up in smoke, while he defaulted on his debts and neglected to secure the roof over his children's heads.

I wonder how much Flores has charged Amaral to write this genuflecting load of rubbish? More so I bet Flores demanded cash on delivery!

I see that Amaral admitted to his debts and said they would be paid! If I was his creditors I would not be holding my breath, he did not bother to pay them all when he had the money freely in his own bank accounts (or in his wife's name).

Isn't it strange Amaral comes out with all these promises when his fat neck and five wobbling chins are on the chopping block?

Didn't he say exactly the same thing when he was pulled up on making money out of pimping off Madeleine McCann? Didn't he say he was going to donate a percentage of h the money he earned to children's charities?

I bet no such money was ever donated.

His creditors shouldn't hold their breath now either, because Amaral is going to be considerably poorer soon to the tune of £1 million and his book injuncted for good.

Also his new book looks pretty libellous, so that will get slapped with an injunction too.

Talking about income, I wonder if Isabel Duarte realises that Amaral gets royalties from that other book he co-authored?

I think I will write a book about the renowned criminologist that gets all his thesis from an American TV crime programme.

You can just imagine this prat Flores as an expert witness in court, when he is questioned on what he based his evidence, he would have to answer the CSI American TV programme.

And if Moita Flores has to quote Sherlock Holmes, Dr Watson and Galileo as some kind of proof of what Amaral is saying, then Amaral is in bigger trouble than even I think! it is pathetic

Someone needs to tell Moita Flores that Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson are *FICTIONAL* characters and Galileo was born in 1512 and Locard, would completely destroy Amaral's argument.

If this is all this new book has to offer, at best it will be totally discredited as a load of nonsense and at worse it will be laughed at by real criminologist and detectives.

jean wrote:Quote ......... 'He knows what nobody else does, about Maddie’s hidden destiny.'

Too right he does, he bloody well engineered it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cath

Carlos Anjos is the union rep for the PJ and he is as bad as Amaral. Of course Anjos will support Amaral, he would, wouldn't he? Anjos is also the idiot that completely misunderstood the markers on DNA evidence and made a complete untrue allegation and set a media frenzy off. Funny that, I never heard Amaral complaining about that!

Pierre Paulo cristovao, who worked with Amaral when someone in the PJ allowed five men to torture Leonor Cipriano. This was the case where Amaral gained his criminal conviction for perverting the course of justice and committing perjury!
Sargento is supposed to be a forensic criminologist the man who holds a bank account for Amaral, into which pensioners money is paid to pay for his defense.

Joao Grade was Leonor Cipriano's former lawyer, who mounted a dreadful defense for her and allowed her to be convicted, he was also the lawyer arrested for trying to smuggle drugs into a prison.

Tavares Almeida was one of the principle officers in the 2 days interrogation of Kate. This man is also up on charges in a separate case to Amaral.

He also went on trial over accusations that he beat up an innocent man during a police interview.

Tavares Almeida and two other Portuguese officers will be tried over claims they assaulted a robbery suspect and left him with four broken ribs and severe bruising to his throat, stomach and back.

He is also the man who requested extended leave when his boss (Amaral) got the sack!

These men are all Amaral's "friends" some of them are the thugs that Amaral sent out of his party to attack Marcos and his friends, these people have all been reported to the police and to Portugal's attorney general.

It is worth saying here, that the McCanns are not on trial for anything connected to Madeleine's disappearance, so Amaral calling witnesses like this will carry no weight what so ever. This is a civil case to assess whether Amaral has made libellous comments and committed defamation and if by so doing has damaged the search for Madeleine and it can be proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he has done all of this.
All these people's statements will be just their opinions and really they should not even be heard in this case and when it finally does get going, I do not think they will be allowed to be heard, it appears that Amaral and that goon of a lawyer who said he had swine flu when he hadn't do not appear to understand this.

The McCanns have been cleared of all blame by the Portuguese attorney general and two top prosecutors, they are totally innocent under the eyes of the law, so amaral inferring that they killed their daughter is a nonsense.
I also really do hope that cabrita brings that stupid Calpol argument up, I would really love it if they did, the McCanns being doctors will literally wipe the floor with him, the buffoon.

actually no i think he wrote a book about Madeleine called 'the star of Madeleine'

Here an interesting link ...one i like to go to now and then for a little read of....its from my emails..saved along with some other links i find interesting to read.

http://the-elite-and-child-abduction.blogspot.com/2009/06/portuguese-claim-that-madeleine-is-dead.html

And in the meantime those abducted lie between the lies and cover ups. No one can get to the bottom of it because its been covered up from day one by those who no one suspected. All the leads,all the evidence,all the dna,all the forensics...flawed....because this is a child who isn't to be found.

Like the link says...(and i agree with it)

''The so-called "arguido" status lodged against Gerald and Kate McCann
was an integral part of that strategy, as it served the dual purpose of
constraining them and in parallel provided sufficient time for the
crime to become settled according to plans. The abduction of Madeleine
McCann was well-planned and the abductor acted on behalf of others.''

''By claiming that she is dead, they are protecting those who are
ultimately responsible for the crime. We further believe that the case
will not be resolved by using conventional methods; regardless of what
new information is given to the Portuguese police, they will continue
claiming that Madeleine is dead to prevent the truth from being known.''

Are they all members of the same political party

Not sure,most likely yes. Amaral and Flores definitely yes.