Composite From Guardian of Small Child on Moroccan Lady's Back Next to Madeleine

The family was ALEGEDLY traced, under very dubious circumstances, not by police or detectives, but by a journalist, less than 24 hours after this press article went to print. The child who they claim was Madeleine, in fact has several features that do not resemble the girl in the picture at all, and when a photograph of the little girls supposed birth cirtificate is examined more closely, it shows that she was born in 1948. I have always maintained that the girl in this photo IS Madeleine, but that this picture was photoshopped, to show Madeleine as being in Morocco, probably to throw the investigation off the scent. The particular journalist involved has been in trouble with his own profesional conduct board several times, for faking stories.

vee8 wrote:The family was ALEGEDLY traced, under very dubious circumstances, not by police or detectives, but by a journalist, less than 24 hours after this press article went to print. The child who they claim was Madeleine, in fact has several features that do not resemble the girl in the picture at all, and when a photograph of the little girls supposed birth cirtificate is examined more closely, it shows that she was born in 1948. I have always maintained that the girl in this photo IS Madeleine, but that this picture was photoshopped, to show Madeleine as being in Morocco, probably to throw the investigation off the scent. The particular journalist involved has been in trouble with his own profesional conduct board several times, for faking stories.

Also...the younger taller woman in the full photo had a very very similar build and stance to the woman in the Belgian Bank Video...............They also coincidentally both tracked back to the Molenbeek (not sure of the spelling) area in Belgium...........I mean how much of a coincidence is that ?

i think the picture could be fake,a deliberate attempt to divert attention.The picture was taken by a tourist and only shown at a later date when she went home downloaded her pics onto the pc and discovered this particular picture...

Now i know they might be a poor family but how much of a coincidence that she happens to be wearing the exact same clothing to!!

to many coincidences here.

i have been talking to minxy about this loads in the past...shes had loads of reads on this sort of thing...how people get kidnapped etc...adults to! and they cant tell no one because those who they tell are those who are involved.Its extremely big problem.If madeleine is caught up in some sort of big thing here her parents will be fighting the authorities to get her back.When the people helping them find her are those who are also preventing them find her...its not surprising this case seems to be going around and around in circles

Royal wrote:

Bluj, Thanks for the photograph which I have seen before. I must admit there is a great likeness to Madeleine but having said that, some little girls of that age do have simlar features, and remarkably even the childs hair in the photograph is of a similar colouring and texture to that of Madeleine, but then, how many toddlers start their lives with fair hair, even blonde and then darken as they grow older? My Grandson as a small child had curly hair like spun gold but as time went by it gradually darkened and now as an adult his hair is very dark bown! Am I mistaken or was this Morocan lady not traced and the child proved not to be Madeleine? Having said all that Bluj I must say were I to be looking at that photograph for the first time I would have sworn it was Madeleine being carried on the womans back!!

Alroy.

Agreed Royal. But something about the photo has always bothered me. I tell myself the same....there's something about that little girl though.....the eyes I think, so much like Madeleine's big eyes, like Kate McCann said, the ones that were always open.....

vee8 wrote:T I have always maintained that the girl in this photo IS Madeleine, but that this picture was photoshopped, to show Madeleine as being in Morocco, probably to throw the investigation off the scent. The particular journalist involved has been in trouble with his own profesional conduct board several times, for faking stories.

Where do you think she was instead, Vee? Do you believe simply Madeleine's face was put on some other little girl's body? Or that it is a legit picture but simply claimed to be from Morocco?

I do think that the McCanns did have a read on a blonde girl in Morocco.....but that it turns out to be an American girl in a case of parental kidnapping. It sounds like that was their first big hope....that was the lead that made Kate McCann leave the house to pick up the twins clutching cuddle cat on her lap and driving through the media gauntlet. (when it turns out not to be Madeleine)

Bluj

I never heard that. Are you talking about the sighting just after Madeleine was taken of the little blond girl at the petrol station, or the one outside the hotel?

I'm searching for the article now. I think it was one of the a year on articles with the grandparents, Diane.

Ta for that.

I have deleted my last post because I think I have remembered some of the information incorrectly. My apolgies to all.

It would still be good if Alex were able to check, if that is possible, whether then photo has been altered. Thanks Alex

bluj1515 wrote:

vee8 wrote:T I have always maintained that the girl in this photo IS Madeleine, but that this picture was photoshopped, to show Madeleine as being in Morocco, probably to throw the investigation off the scent. The particular journalist involved has been in trouble with his own profesional conduct board several times, for faking stories.

Where do you think she was instead, Vee? Do you believe simply Madeleine's face was put on some other little girl's body? Or that it is a legit picture but simply claimed to be from Morocco?

I don't know were she was at the time, only that, obviously, she was and still is alive. The whole picture looks staged to me. The 'Woman' with the child on her back has many times been said to look more like a man. Look at the pattern on the dress, and the positioning of the flowers on the front. No self respecting Moroccan woman would wear a dress drawing attention to her breasts and nipples in such a fashion. No, it was all a very carefully staged scarlett kipper, to divert attention away from Madeleine's true location. Remember, in my opinion there are large organisations and big players involved in this.

I know this is an old story now, but it has always struck a chord.
The journalist just happened to find that poor family the next day?
Yet, even though they had no running water, electricity, lived on a poor remote farm, their clothes were remarkably immaculate.
Spotless white blouse, perfectly ironed?? Mmmm......
More like someone had just shopped at Marks n Spencers for a photo shoot IMO!
Very suspicious.

Peaceful1 wrote:I know this is an old story now, but it has always struck a chord.
The journalist just happened to find that poor family the next day?
Yet, even though they had no running water, electricity, lived on a poor remote farm, their clothes were remarkably immaculate.
Spotless white blouse, perfectly ironed?? Mmmm......
More like someone had just shopped at Marks n Spencers for a photo shoot IMO!
Very suspicious.

hi peacful.

Another thing..the picture was supposedly taken by some Spanish tourists who only noticed the similarity to madeleine a few months later.Isnt it also remarkable how the woman in the picture also wears the exact same clothes when she is found by a journalist as she wore a few months earlier in the picture??

Also this picture here......makes me wonder for people who are so poor,where on earth are they goign??whos on the move??and why?

When jouranlists caught up with this family there was no sign of the other women in the picture....makes you wouldner if this picture captured the moving on of madeleine her carer.





I have this video here,the beginning part of it is true imo.The woman in morocco looks like the woman in the Belgium sighting to.

Yes.can't recall exactly but there was something about the girls father.........will try and rack through the sawdust in my brain.........

double post

Well I've always believed it was a set up...

The father in Belgium came forward and was interviewed by the Police, he said it was his daughter with her nanny.

PS If you can still find the photo of the girl on the back of this "woman" taken a few days later with her father there was a stunning likeness between her and Madeleine.

.......The father in Belgium came forward and was interviewed by the Police, he said it was his daughter with her nanny. .......

I always thought that it was very very strange that there was no photograph of the child and the nanny, as there has been on other occasions and other sightings, proving that it was not Madeleine!!!

The same woman in Belgium was also wearing same or almost same clothes as the one in the background of the moroccan piccy.
Wasnt there also some connection between this moroccan family/belgium father and moelenbeek (sp?)
Defo something not right with this.

This is very suspicious: two woman with the same resemblance in Morocco and in Belgium, very suspicious indeed, the child in the back of the woman in Morocco, really looks like sweet Madeleine, the child in Belgium, really looks like sweet Madeleine. In my opinion, both sightings are very suspicious, it raises too many suspicions and questions, and those who told it wasn´t her are not reliable, something very suspicious is related with both these two sightings, also about other sightings.

rosemary wrote:PS If you can still find the photo of the girl on the back of this "woman" taken a few days later with her father there was a stunning likeness between her and Madeleine.

I have a few images Rosemary...any of these...