Marcos complaint sent to United Nations

Joana Cipriano case

May 19, 2011

Important information to the media

Copy to:
Attorney General's Office
Portuguese Lawyer´s Association
International Amnesty

Given the important public interest of all cases of disappearances of children, which includes the interest earned by the case of the disappearance of Joana Cipriano Portuguese child, Marcos Aragão Correia, Attorney of Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano and António Leandro David Silva, respectively mother and stepfather of this child, hereby publicly disclose the following:

1st - This past Tuesday, May 17, 2011, followed, via registered mail to the High Commissioner for Human Rights of the United Nations, based in Switzerland, a formal complaint against the Portuguese Government by practice of brutal torture against mother and stepfather of the child Joana Cipriano;

2 - According to statistics consulted relatively to the Committee Against Torture, of the UN, this is the first time it was admitted to the United Nations a complaint of this type against Portugal, while all the earlier cases of other citizens against Portugal, for infringing Similar Human Rights, entered the European Court of Human Rights and not the United Nations (there is a legal impossibility to appeal simultaneously to both institutions with the same facts);

3 - We believe that this unprecedented case in the United Nations against the Portuguese government will result in a greater internationalism of the case of the disappearance of Joana Cipriano, leading to an increased pressure on the Portuguese authorities to reopen the case and investigate finally the case with a scientific and correct way, as never done so far;

4 - Attached to this email is in Word format, their joint complaint submitted against Portugal to the United Nations concerning the disappearance of Joana Cipriano and the brutal torture against their parents by agents of the Portuguese state, and we authorize public reproduction of the contents of the document;

5 - Additional information about the case of the disappearance of Joana Cipriano can be found on the official website of the Lawyer of the parents of the child, in the address

www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com


Funchal, May 19, 2011,

The lawyer of the mother and stepfather of Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro

Marcos Aragão Correia.

Caso Joana Cipriano

19 de Maio de 2011

Informação importante aos órgãos de comunicação social

Com cópia para:
Procuradoria-Geral da República
Ordem dos Advogados Portugueses
Amnistia Internacional
Dado o relevante interesse público de todos os casos de desaparecimentos de crianças, onde se inclui o merecido interesse pelo caso do desaparecimento da criança Portuguesa Joana Cipriano, Marcos Aragão Correia, Advogado de Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano e de António Leandro David Silva, respectivamente mãe e padrasto desta criança, vem por este meio informar publicamente o seguinte:

1º - Na passada Terça-feira, dia 17 de Maio de 2011, seguiu, via correio registado, para o Alto Comissariado para os Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas, com sede na Suiça, queixa formal contra o Estado Português por prática de brutal tortura contra a mãe e contra o padrasto da criança Joana Cipriano;

2º - Segundo as estatísticas consultadas relativamente ao Comité Contra a Tortura das Nações Unidas, esta é a primeira vez que deu entrada nas Nações Unidas uma queixa do género contra Portugal, sendo que todos os processos anteriores de outros cidadãos contra Portugal, por prática de violações semelhantes de Direitos Humanos, deram entrada no Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos Humanos e não nas Nações Unidas (existe a impossibilidade legal de recorrer simultaneamente a ambas as instituições com os mesmos factos);

3º - Cremos que este inédito processo nas Nações Unidas contra o Estado Português resultará num maior internacionalismo do caso do desaparecimento de Joana Cipriano, levando a um incremento da pressão para que as autoridades portuguesas reabram o processo e investiguem finalmente o caso dum modo científico e correcto, como nunca o fizeram até ao momento;

4º - Em anexo no presente email encontra-se, em formato word, a respectiva queixa conjunta enviada contra Portugal às Nações Unidas, referente ao desaparecimento de Joana Cipriano e à brutal tortura praticada contra os seus pais por agentes do Estado Português, sendo que autorizamos a reprodução pública do conteúdo do respectivo documento;

5º - Informações adicionais sobre o caso do desaparecimento de Joana Cipriano podem ser consultadas no website oficial do Advogado dos pais da criança, no endereço www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com .

Funchal, 19 de Maio de 2011,
O Advogado da mãe e do padrasto de Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro,
Marcos Aragão Correia.

Way to go Marcos......

Admin have pmd you on a different matter.

Excellent news. Unbelieveable that a court acknowledged her torture and then denied her a new and fair trial. Here's hoping that at last she will get justice and also that someone will start looking for Joana, because if they find out what happened to her they may also find what happened to some of the other missing children.

Exactly my thoughts jack..

It's unbelievable how they've denied her a new trial.
Especially considering the torture and how flawed the 'evidence' against her was.

COMPLAINT AGAINST PORTUGAL TO THE UNITED NATIONS

17-May-2011

Gentlemen
Members of the Committee Against Torture, UN

Marcos Aragão Correia, lawyer, bearer of Professional Lawyer No. 427m issued by the Portuguese Lawyers Association, domiciled in the Calçada do Pico, 35, Funchal, 9000-206 Funchal, Portugal, hereby submit to the Committee Against Torture High Commissioner for Human Rights UN formal complaint against the Portuguese (Portugal) for torture, on behalf of victims Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano (recluse nº 34 of the Prison Regional Odemira, Avenida Sacadura, 7630 - 123 Odemira, Portugal), António Leandro David Silva (residing at Rua Evangelista Rosado Nunes, No. 14 - 1, Mexilhoeira Grande, 8500 Portimao, Portugal), both their constituents and are for this purpose provided their proxies forensics with special powers Both together in the Annex to this document, under the facts and each of which is stated.

1
Joana

Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, female child, was born in the parish of Porches, Lagoa, Algarve region, Portugal, on May 31, 1996, daughter of Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano and Paulo Jorge Martins Guerreiro. The Parents were to be separated shortly after the birth of Joanna, getting the child to the care of the mother, which, some years later, would join in a de fact regime of António Leandro David Silva, which would be become not only the stepfather of Joana, as well as the biological father of the girl's younger brothers, Ruben and Laura.
Joana and her family later settled residence in the village of Figueira, Portimão, Algarve too.

As well described by her relatives and neighbours, Joana was a sweet girl, a great beauty inside and out, always ready to help all who were close to her.
But the state does not reward merit. And so Joana was born, raised and died in utter poverty, within a poor family with extreme financial needs, and despised, and always to the maximum by the Portuguese State, which never provided to the family any help. Even death has not saved the continuation of the abuse and violence against the state her name and honor, as we shall see next.

2
The disappearance of Joana

On September 12, 2004 evening, with only 8 years old Joana Cipriano was declared missing by the family. Although many relatives and neighbours had mobilized to search for the child, and the disappearance had been sent to local police (GNR) on the same night, the authorities once again, completely neglected the child, enforcing a rule absolutely stupid: searches could be made only once past 48 hours about the disappearance. But even then nobody saw any police mobilization significantly. The national criminal police responsible for investigation, the Portuguese Judicial Police (PJ), literally stood with folded arms even after the Guarda Nacional Republicana (GNR) has sought to intervene for lack of legal competence. Only 12 (twelve) days after the disappearance of Joana, the Judicial Police thought it was time to investigate! This number can be easily confirmed in the very process of disappearance! Only just twelve days later that the PJ started to do something! And it was not afor Joana´s compassion, no! Because, thanks to a neighbour who always helped devoted the child, the case would become more media in a child's disappearance in Portugal, only later matched by that of Madeleine McCann. Of course, with eyes all over the country, the PJ could not continue to remain inactive. But hopefully they had remained since the PJ intervention, instead of helping, worsen everything came to a point of unspeakable monstrosity, now in a particularly active and criminal contempt proceedings against the child by her mother, stepfather and even neighbours.

3
The criminal investigation

After resolving to do something, the Portuguese Judicial Police, led by Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa, went to the house where Joana lived, again without any equipment suitable for the preservation of any crime scene (which can be very well confirmed by the images TV reports of the time), and "bet" on the theory of the refrigerator and pigs. That is, decided to declare that he believed that Joana picked up inadvertently mother and uncle in the middle of a sexual relationship, they as a result beat her to death, and then cut her body into pieces, and put it in the fridge and later gave it to feed the pigs. But Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral and his team had a problem with this "bet" they had no evidence, and as such they needed to "arrange" them at all costs. This is because, despite forensic laboratory tests, the few traces of blood allegedly collected from the refrigerator (small size) of the house of Joana resulted inconclusive as to its provenance could be blood of any person or even an animal. The same happened with the pigs. The forensic tests carried out their droppings not point towards the pigs had eaten the kids in their meals. All this left Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa and his subordinates of PJ quite "nervous". And then settled for an unbeatable solution! They remembered the history of Portugal, and the history of the Portuguese authorities, including the methods of the Inquisition and the PIDE, the "art of confessing," especially in the art to make them confess what the inquisitors wanted. And decided to once again make use of such "art." Thus, on 14 October 2004, addressed the Odemira Prison, where Leonor Cipriano (Joana´s mother) was provisionally arrested, then transporting her to the premises of the PJ in Faro. During that day, and for several hours, several of the Portuguese Judicial Police officers, under orders from Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral - who was present in the place, brutally tortured Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano, trying to force her to give false statements against her own will, for the disappearance of her daughter Joana. Torture drew together in a physical beating so brutal it left Leonor Cipriano with almost all black body for several weeks. On the same day, Antonio Leandro, Joana's stepfather, was submitted at the same location and also by agents of the Judicial Police under the command of Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, the brutal torture. It was now created the needed "evidence".

4
The torture of the mother of Joana

The then Director of the Prison Odemira, where was provisionally arrested Leonor Cipriano, Dr. Ana Maria Calado, had the courage and the merit of having denounced the torture suffered by Leonor at the hands of the Judicial Police, and has therefore ordered the documentation the material through medical reports and photographs. Moreover, the then National Express newspaper journalist, António Marinho Pinto, also a lawyer and currently Chairman of the Portuguese Lawyer Association, alarmed by the brutal torture perpetrated by the authorities against a helpless woman, denounces the case on the first page of their respective weekly newspaper , thus making research on torture was not muffled as it was, and still is traditional in Portugal.
However, the investigation of national authorities on the torture would take about three years, enough for it to previous torture could not be invoked in the process that would condemn Leonor Cipriano to 16 years and 8 months in prison as a co-author of crime of murder of her daughter Joana, and still committed the crime of concealment and desecration of a corpse, a process which, in clear violation of the law, would use the same false confessions obtained under torture to convince jurors to convict Leonor Cipriano.
Only when was adjudicated the case cited, is that prosecutors fearfully forward with an indictment against five of the actors involved, when continuing to represent legally the lawyer João Grade Leonor dos Santos.
As part of his work with the Spanish detective agency Metodo 3, the agency hired by the parents of the child also kidnapped Madeleine McCann, the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia, concerned by the remarkable similarities between the two disappearances, visit Leonor Cipriano, which later complains about João Grade dos Santos, saying that he had always commanded her to keep silent. Moved by the efforts of Marcos Aragão Correia in clarifying the truth about the two missing children, the mother of Joana Cipriano rejects her first lawyer (John Grade dos Santos), asking the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia to assume the exclusive sponsorship, which actually came to pass in September 2008.
Preparing the representation of Leonor Cipriano at the trial approached about the crimes of torture, Marcos Aragão Correia notes that the previous attorney had not deducted claim for damages within the statutory periods, and consequently quickly tried to correct this serious flaw with the introduction of missing requirements, even though that would be almost nil chances of success due to the lateness of the same procedural requirements, which actually came to be confirmed by the rejection of them by the court, citing the already lengthy course of the deadline for submission of the application damages. Furthermore, the deadlines for the filing of private prosecution and witness list had passed without much of João Grade dos Santos had presented such important procedural documents, which led also by clearly untimely, the court rejected these documents once submitted by Marcos Aragão Correia once assumed the representation of Leonor Cipriano.
Later came to discover that John Grade dos Santos was a personal friend of Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral , being guest of honor of his birthday parties, but also would become his patron in the attempt to stage which the same Gonçalo Amaral is held with the aim of obtaining the license to practice as a lawyer.
The filing time of the respective claim for damages prevented through the judiciary way, Leonor Cipriano was entitled to compensation for damage suffered as under Articles 71 and following of the Portuguese Criminal Procedure Code (principle of membership).
Thus, although it proved to the Portuguese judicial system, with res judicata following the last possible decision in terms of national resource, which kept the full ruling of a lower court - criminal case No. 1503/04.3TAFAR the Court of Jury Faro - Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano who was brutally tortured by agents of the Portuguese Judicial Police with the aim of seriously hurting her to try to obtain certain statements against their will, no practical effect stemmed from that decision. If it is true that two of the accused officers were actually convicted, namely Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral sentenced to 1 years 6 months imprisonment for the crime of making false allegations, and Antonio Fernandes Nuno Cardoso sentenced to 2 years and 3 months of imprisonment for the crime of forgery of a document, it is also true that both agents convicted walked out of the process with both suspended prison sentences in their performances, which combined with the absence of civil damages that Leonor Cipriano could claim, and yet Above all, no reopening of the investigation into the disappearance of Joana Cipriano, does rule over the whole process a genuine feeling of impunity and utter failure (intentional) of the Preventive State.
But considering the vast wealth of material supporting the police investigation proved merely held by torture, poor legal decision could be corrected by administrative action, if any, of course, a moralized government in Portugal, which is not so any event, by assigning a compensation management - a logical consequence of a court decision confirms that existed brutal torture perpetrated by state agents but not yet draw the appropriate consequences practices - and, above all, to intercede with the Lord's Attorney General's Office to reopen the investigation into the disappearance of Joana Cipriano, through, inter alia, an appeal for review of Judgement raised by the prosecutor. None of this was done for political power. The United Nations itself has stated in previous reports that the figure of the Prosecutor General's Office in Portugal is not an independent figure of political power (as opposed to what is believed by the Portuguese government) as it is appointed solely for political power and, while this figure is as much the chief prosecutor, of course, entirely and inherently undermines any remaining independence of you may want to assert themselves within their own prosecutors. It will be necessary to add that the same holds for the Supreme Council of Magistracy, a body which exercises the power to discipline and promotion on the judiciary, given that members belonging to that office are mostly, also appointed by political power. We will say that even at present, there has been so great a vicious cycle of political control over the Supreme Judicial Council, that the whole body is currently controlled in practice by political power, since joining the majority of members directly appointed by the president and the parliament, have yet to add the other elected by the judges of the Supreme Court, which, remember, to reach this position had to be previously promoted by the Supreme Judicial Council which it was mostly composed of members appointed directly by political power. And such political control is also evident in the Constitutional Court, all of whose judges are directly elected by political power. And even more evident, the political manipulation of the National Directors of the Judicial Police, appointed and removed directly by the Minister of Justice, and the Directors of the National Public Security Police and Commanders-General of the National Guard, appointed and dismissed by the Minister of Interior ministers of any folder that directly respond to the instructions and orders of the Prime Minister of Portugal.
It should be noted that the Portuguese Lawyers Association publicly criticized the criminal silence of most of the political class in Portugal compared to proven torture committed by the state against Leonor Cipriano. Joining the repeated public denunciations of International Amnesty against Portugal, which joined the torture of the mother of Joana Cipriano in international reports of the years 2009 and 2010, the Chairman of the Portuguese Lawyers Association, António Marinho Pinto, deemed it unacceptable that he said that a state of law continue to torture people, and that the Portuguese government, supported by the complicit silence of the other parties represented in parliament, does nothing to prevent torture in Portugal. In the second half of last month, the Chairman of the Portuguese Lawyers Association has even calling for electoral abstention, as most effective way of combating the "mediocrity, incompetence and opportunism of all Portuguese politicians' appeal to the signer of this document align themselves and their constituents in full. Indeed, in recent national elections (for the presidency), the electoral abstention has obtained an absolute majority, reaching about 54% of voters. That is, most voters have not voted, and the obvious discontent with the whole class of Portuguese politics, adding that there is still a high number of spoiled ballots, blank and young people who do not register. According to the Chairman of the Portuguese Lawyers Association, the rise of electoral abstention, and the consequent rejection of the models represented by several mediocre Portuguese political parties, could provide an effective means for the much needed overhaul of the country, without resorting to violence.

5
Abuse of the stepfather of Joana

On June 23, 2009, following a formal complaint lodged by Mr David Leandro Silva and after various steps of investigation, the Prosecutor of the Republic of Faro, José Fonte Santa, Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral was accused of a crime of torture against the stepfather of Joana, that torture was intended that the tortured which had the purpose of made Leonor to told false statements against her will on the missing child.
The complainant, through her lawyer Marcos Aragao Correia, filed a private prosecution in time, list of witnesses and claim for damages against the accused.
The accused requested opening statement, and to our surprise, Dr. Jose Fonte Santa has been replaced without explanation, and the new public prosecutor in the case came to ask for no prosecution of the accused Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa, which the Judge of the Instruction of Faro agreed, not pronouncing the accused. This decision was appealed to the Relação by António Leandro, who however, given the insistent position of the prosecutor asking the defendant not accused, came to not get approval, the accused was not brought to trial.
However, one of the documents that formed the basis for the initial indictment of Prosecutor's Office, is unquestionable against its probative value (copy enclosed, original in the process). On the morning of 15 October 2010, immediately after being questioned for almost an entire day at the premises of the Judicial Police in Faro, the same day that 14 was arguably tortured Leonor Cipriano, Joana Cipriano's stepfather enters the emergency room Portimão Hospital (Hospital in the western Algarve) - the nearest to their residence in the village of Figueira, where he had left the PJ after the torture, because of aggression, and the medical staff that the defendant attended the radiology department. The document stating all these facts hospital received the due amount by the public prosecutor who investigated the complaint, and, in conjunction with the abundant evidence of witnesses heard, led to the deduction of charges. Strangely, and without any known reason, the hierarchy of prosecutors dictated the replacement of the original prosecutor, rather than naming a magistrate who, also without any valid reason, amended by 100% to the starting position of the prosecution, asking instead to not charge the accused that the Prosecutor's Office had recently accused considering there is evidence enough. The torture that the stepfather of Joana Cipriano was the victim, was so completely unpunished against the Portuguese judicial system.

6
The persecution against the State Attorney Marcos Aragão Correia

Since then it has been known the ruling of the Tribunal Judicial de Faro stated that establishing the existence of brutal torture perpetrated by the Portuguese Judicial Police against Leonor Cipriano was publicly disclosed that prosecutors accused, underlined - the lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and president of an association, of commit a crime of defamation against the convicted Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral , to have claimed that Leonor Cipriano was tortured by agents of the Judicial Police! This prosecution policy, the Attorney Leonor Cipriano was never notified in due time, having had only later general knowledge of its content via a third party. As the unofficial notice, in legal terms what the law requires, never took place, Marcos Aragão Correia has decided not to participate in the political process driven by the legal representatives of the Portuguese, having met later, after the close of the hearings requested by the president of the association also accused who had been pronounced, even with the President for a crime of defamation has long condemned the Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral , for having reported that, long ago, proved torture of Leonor Cipriano in fact occurred and was committed by agents of the Portuguese Judicial Police who met directly at the same Gonçalo Amaral, head up the field for investigation of the PJ to the disappearance of Joana Cipriano. Namely, here the Portuguese to defend their subordinates and immoral criminals, even at the expense of a complete and blatant contradiction, perhaps with the aim of concealing the heads of the head, all involved in the "carte blanche" to torture. And perhaps too, the image of tourism in the Algarve! After all, it's good to know that the tourists go to abduct children in the Algarve! Is it better, traitors in the eyes of national politicians and his mercenaries, who think that mothers who killed children, so the tourists will always come with their money, much needed cash to the corrupt who ruin this miserable country! Thus, it is not surprising that the same prosecutor, according to the press, accused Leonor Cipriano's lawyer for defamation against Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, has dismissed, without any valid reasons, the complaint filed by Marcos Aragão Correia to the Gonçalo Amaral for defamation! After all, prosecutors politicized, others involved in scandals and public prosecutors to threaten their investigating the corrupt Prime Minister of Portugal, the mercenary state reform, Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa, may defame at will Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, in particular arguing that the press of one's spiritual beliefs are synonymous with need psychiatric hospitalization, but the lawyer's mother Joan can not report the truth, as confirmed by the unanimous ruling of the Court of Popular Jury, that he was involved in Gonçalo Amaral brutal torture suffered by Leonor Cipriano! The poor, uncultured and extremely defamatory statements Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa, clearly reflect the type of mercenary repugnant that the Portuguese fascist like to enlist in its ranks, reliable image of its leaders.

Marcos Aragão Correia was also an account holder at the Caixa Geral de Depósitos, a bank that, under the guise of a limited company, however, is controlled 100% by the Portuguese. In May 2010, without giving any reason or warning, the Caixa Geral de Depósitos blocked the credit card that Leonor Cipriano's lawyer was entitled, immediately after it has made payment to another company that hosts his official website at the address www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com, a site that discloses the truth about the disappearance of Joana Cipriano police criminal investigation and that the child, family and neighbors have been victims. Although he approached his desk in Funchal, officials were unable to detect any anomaly with the credit card, but where, however, Marcos Aragão Correia tried to make a payment, this was refused with the message "card inhibited. Finally, about a week later, after further contacts with the counter, an employee could obtain information from Lisbon that the card had been placed in such a "gray list", list the official himself had never heard of and which resulted in inhibition card counters but without having access to information from blocking. Made written complaints with the inclusion of a request for immediate cancellation of debit and credit, the Caixa Geral de Depósitos never provided any explanation or even reply for about two months, and only on July 5, 2010, due to a complaint by the Banco de Portugal Caixa Geral de Depósitos sends a letter to a page where "regrets the inconvenience caused," without stating any reason for never having failed to block the card or for never having warned about the same locking . This answer was given new complaint to the Bank of Portugal, which, as expected, stifled the case and declared itself incompetent to rule on the same (copies of documents attached). That is, the same patron state, which controls both Caixa Geral Deposit and Bank of Portugal, the same boss that allowed the failure of national economic system with high losses for the population in general but with immense profits for a small group of corrupt, State the same patron self-regulated, self-judging, and self-chokes up, ruthlessly pursuing all those who dare to denounce his Machiavellian.

The television station TVI announced well in advance and then aired a documentary on national exclusivity highly defamatory of the responsibility of the convicted Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, titled "The Truth of the Lie", which sought an attack now closed, again without presenting any proof against the parents of another child has been abducted in the Algarve, Madeleine McCann, accusing them also that they are directly responsible for the death of their daughter. Never saw any criticism of the Portuguese government at the same documentary that publicly humiliated and abused a couple of British citizens who chose to holiday in Portugal, hoping to get the same friendly treatment that the majority of institutional Portuguese citizens receive when visiting the UK. However, the government of Portugal was mobilized with all forces to stop a news television channel of the same (Journal of the Sixth) that had shown evidence of several serious corruption of the Prime Minister of Portugal. This mobilization of government to censor its newspaper included, as is public knowledge, contacts with Portugal Telecom (PT) to buy their silence and TVI newspaper. Indeed, and once again, the State boss, holding a minority of shares in PT, which however have special privileges over the others, including the veto, made according to the widely publicized in national media, the use of its directors to silence their newspaper, but without initial success due to the prompt disclosure of corrupt government antics. The newspaper would later be silenced by other means. We want to stress here that the disclosure of this example, which can be easily confirmed by the thousands of news published in various national media, is quoted here only to understand how the government of Portugal is using every means at their disposal to pursue its critics. And Portugal Telecom is just one of them, that is relevant to what we describe below regarding our case. Marcos Aragao Correia is the owner of the website, which is its official website, titled "The girls who came from the stars" in the address www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com, which publishes details of cases in which children worked, which include the names of Joana Cipriano and Madeleine McCann, and still Francesca Orofino, very unfortunately, the latter to a lesser degree. Noteworthy, Joana Cipriano and Madeleine McCann are the two most publicized cases of missing children in Portugal, Madeleine McCann and the more media coverage internationally. It is natural that the official website of Marcos Aragão Correia, as this since September 2008, the Advocate of the mother and stepfather of Joana Cipriano, and has since December 2007 to July 2008 inclusive, worked, also always without remuneration, with the Spanish detective agency Metodo 3, which was first and foremost a detective agency hired by Madeleine McCann's parents to search for their daughter, here is natural, we said, that his official website has significant relevance in the Internet. And therefore, all major international search engines, including Google, Bing, Yahoo, among many others, still in Portugal and the search engine of ZON (which is not part of Portugal Telecom), show us your results Search all issues addressed within the website "The girls who came from the stars" with their links to it. And the same applies in relation to the official website about the work of his late father Anthony Aragon, regarded by many experts as "one of the most important figures of Portuguese Culture", standing in the address http://antonioaragao.blogspot.com /. However, to date, the official website of Marcos Aragão Correia in www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com does not appear in search engine results Toad, leading Internet portal owned by Portugal Telecom. The few references that appear are only related to other sites that mention the site of Leonor Cipriano's lawyer. Not a single result appears on the site itself, even when entering the exact name of it, ie, girls who came from the stars. And until recently, also the site of the work of the father of Marcos Aragão Correia, did not appear in search results Toad / PT, having just emerged from last week, perhaps due to media attention generated around the latest initiatives undertaken by the Foundation Serralves concerning the Portuguese Experimental Poetry, for which Anthony Aragon is considered the leading pioneer in Portugal, and for which would be too obvious Sapo / PT continue censoring. Asked Sapo / PT why, despite the website "The girls who came from the stars" have been subjected for more than one year to the directory's own Frog, still does not appear in search results even Toad, unlike what happens with all international search engines, was answered by the support of Toad that, although it did use the search engine Bing (where the site is included), used the same with "distinctive features", but never able to explain why this "differentiation technique resulted in complete and genuine criticism of the official website of the Attorney Leonor Cipriano.

7
What really happened to Joana

After the Court of Faro Jury has declared unanimously proved the brutal torture suffered was the mother of Joana Cipriano, Marcos Aragão Correia, having gathered a large number of strong evidence, filed on June 8, 2009, an Extraordinary Review Appeal Judgement, addressed to the Portuguese Supreme Court, in order to reopen the case of the disappearance of Joana. Despite all the evidence, including testimony from the first parent that tells everything she knows about the disappearance of her daughter (remember she had remained silent just because of the instructions from her previous attorney), a free confession of the uncle's child obtained without appeal to any form of torture or any other form of coercion, and various testimonies from relatives, neighburs and others independent, the Portuguese Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by considering "insufficient" evidence presented. Perhaps you forgot to mention that years ago, condemned, then without a single valid proof, Leonor Cipriano for the murder of her daughter!
Below, parts of the evidence presented as part of our appeal for review of Judgement, referring to Case No. 330/04.2JAPTM the District Court of Portimão, while also expressing our great surprise and perplexity at the fact that the Portuguese authorities have only publicly released a single photograph of Joana, just less representative of her image and beauty, where it was to make a face, and all other photos of Joana, at the time of her disappearance also delivered by relatives, and many of which contained the proceedings were kept secret until the intervention of Marcos Aragão Correia investigating the case. It is in these pictures that we can see how Joana Cipriano was a really beautiful girl and these photographs can be inferred easily, unlike the Portuguese police have always tried to believe that this child would indeed be a preferred target, precisely because of its beauty, a criminal and immoral any network of child prostitution.

(Transcripts)

On January 15, 2009, the Applicant decided to report - the first time free from any form of coercion - all he knew about the disappearance of her daughter Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro. As a result, gave rise to the declaration / confession annexed in the original, which dated and signed on all pages (eight in number). The following is the content of this document:

Declaration

I hereby Maria Leonor Domingos Cipriano, cellmate number 34 of Prison Odemira, today January 15, 2009, and I swear I confess that this is all I know the truth about the disappearance of my daughter Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro:

- That my brother Joao Domingos Manuel Cipriano convinced me on the day that came to my house in Figueira (at dawn on September 12, 2004) that I had to look after economic conditions of three children, they would be a miserable as I am, no future and no money and no education. He knew a couple who could not have children and he remembered that he could be a new family for at least Joana, because Laura and Ruben were very small and everyone would be suspicious if any of them disappear. Joana could say she had been kidnapped. That would be well delivered Joana, from a family that you would give everything they had money. He knew them and ensuring they are reliable, it would never do harm to Joana, who just wanted a daughter who might not have. That Joana would be taken abroad, and I never could see the person but they would do everything possible to give me the news and even send her some photos of her when they were older. That he (João Cipriano) was my brother and I could trust him because he would want the best for Joana. They had to invent a story to the disappearance of Joana, because by law I could not give the adopted daughter Joana as this couple in this way because the law did not allow it to Portugal. But I do not worry, because Joana would be well treated and would be best for her future. At first I refused but he insisted so much that I could make believe that what he said was actually the best for my children. That I would receive financial assistance in order to create and my two young children (Laura and Ruben). That everything would go well, he would talk to Joana explained to her what would happen. Everything was already arranged. I believed and trusted my brother João Cipriano. He arrived on 12 already for this purpose. I've never met anyone of those people who told me that he would take Joana abroad. But he always assured me that they were reliable and that he put his hands on fire for these people. Combined for all 20 hours. Then he asked me to pick up Joana shortly after 18 hours at the house of my mother Maria de Lourdes David. I went, I took Joana home in front of me and he told her she would have a nice surprise that day, because they would make a great trip. Joana was happy and wanted to know more, but he did not tell many details that later she would know. My young children were playing but did not hear anything, as though they were in the room were removed. At 20 hours sent to Joana to make such purchases Pastry Celia. Mal went to Joana, João clothing saved many of them in a plastic bag, no more coming back even with the bag, or with Jane. I knew he would deliver the Joana this couple so she returned home from shopping, but without entering. John said to him that we should both do believe that Joana had been abducted by strangers. Only an hour and a half after I came to see João Cipriano, but he arrived without money, that money he said the couple would give me to help my young children. I asked him what had happened. At first he did not answer, saying only that everything had gone well. Just then I saw blood on the bottom of his pants. I was alarmed. I asked him about Joana. Then he told me that things had not gone well. That the "guys" (quote) did not have the money. Joana knew that everything that he had told her she would spend a holiday to Spain with a couple of friends. Then she heard the discussion that he (João) had with the "dudes" and realized he would "once". What they have not taken because he did not give it because there was no money. Which sent the "dudes" while Joana and then started saying he would tell everything. He gave her a slap. She protested further. He was right, but she was silent. Wildly up and that the girl died. That the body was hidden for him to undo it later. I panicked. But he told me that since it was no use, if I hear that the two were going to jail because we were both mitted that. I shouted to him that I did not kill Joana, he replied that if I did not kill her at least wanted to sell. After a long discussion, I agreed to say nothing. Later, he told me he had buried the body "up there in the hills of Figueira. I was afraid. I wept for my daughter. I prayed for her. I know I did not kill her. But I fear I was arrested for trying to sell Joana. I just wanted the best for her. But people may not understand. I decided since then that never went through anything like that, and they would always say that he knew nothing, as my brother's killer said he would do. I could not bring Joana back. When I was beaten by the Judicial Police, which is true that as I said in the Court of Faro, signed what they wanted me to sign, not even read what it was. I never said anything, just said what they wanted, what they wrote, that only later came to know what it was. I did not kill Joana. Mr. Gonçalo Amaral knows it, so why had beat me? Why? Why am I stuck for the murder of my daughter Joana? Why? I did not kill her! Who killed her was the monster of my brother, João Cipriano. Police know this ... Why was I arrested? I made a mistake. I trusted at João's monster, I regret what I did, but only wanted the best for my kids, for Joana. Forgive me, Joana. My darling, my angel from heaven then, my dear Joana, forgive me.

Odemira, January 15, 2009

Maria Leonor Domingos Cipriano. "

The current authorized representative of the Applicant was well aware that this confession of his constituency was not sufficient to prove the facts reported in it. Let us remember that the Appellant's conviction was based not only on their false confessions extracted by the staff of the Judicial Police in charge of investigations under brutal torture and cruel (which resulted in the criminal case No. 1503/04.3TAFAR in which the Court of Jury Faro has already proven by a unanimous ruling that the Appellant was brutally tortured by the same police), but also and above all the false allegations made against her by her brother João Manuel Domingos Cipriano, who until May this year when indicted by the Applicant's co-authorship murder of the girl Joana Cipriano. Knowing this, the current Counsel for Appellant decided to move on May 18 this year by the Prison Carregueira (Sintra), where he is imprisoned João Manuel Domingos Cipriano, and compare it with the free and true confession of the Appellant. Because the brother persisted in the false accusations against her sister Leonor, the applicant's representative then decided to "bluff": João said he had received information that an inmate sentenced to more than twenty years in prison for murder, had been told to ask Prison transfer to the Carregueira in order to assassinate him, that this applicant's representative had knowledge of such fact by police sources as a number of public telephones prisons - including this - are bugged ; intercepted conversation in which the speaker of the inmate seemed preoccupied with the possibility of João prove to pressure sensitive data on those who tried to buy Joana, following public revelations of this year's Sister Leonor Cipriano, where both the (imagined) inmate as his (imagined) partner would be part of this criminal network, which was not possible to identify the same police party, but that the inmate had already given instructions to family members to go live into the zone of Belas - Sintra, in order to achieve the granting of the transfer, that the (imagined) telephone conversation the caller promised him in return a lot of money to be delivered to your same family, and who explained briefly that he only had to simulate a suicide to cover up the murder of John, we could prevent this transfer if João finally told the truth about the disappearance of Joana Cipriano, but it did not, nothing would be done by us and João would be assassinated in less than three months. Well, actually, if the Appellant's statement was false, and as such had it not been any attempt to sell the girl by João Manuel Domingos Cipriano, this would have nothing to fear, and invented such a story could at most , laughing. Only it was not the reaction of João actually transpired that an immediate and enormous distress after a few seconds of hesitation, the applicant's representative questioned whether it was possible to prevent the transfer of the prisoner. When the Counsel for Appellant responded affirmatively since João also collaborate and reveal the whole truth about the disappearance of Joana Cipriano child. And shortly thereafter, John finally admits that "Jane tried to sell." The applicant's representative insisted that it was necessary for him to reveal all the details, even those who were the criminals who tried to buy the Jane and that if the sale was never completed, which was then the girl. John proved to be very fearful about the disclosure of these criminals, and flatly refused to do so until he had evidence that would be protected against such "inmate who wanted to assassinate." Also refused to disclose the whereabouts of the girl's body. Said to have the evidence that such would be protected, just admit that in fact "tried to sell her niece Joana." Revealing himself useless reminders of the applicant's representative to John tell all the details of what happened, then just ask to João Manuel Domingos Cipriano which at least confessed in writing what was already willing to reveal, and he agreed as a condition for the protection of such imagined story. And here the important results from the original document attached to this pleading, written by hand of João Domingos Manuel Cipriano, and signed by the same on May 18 this year, a new document that confirms the essence of the new facts revealed in January Finally the Appellant. The following is the content of the document:

Declaration

I, the undersigned João Domingos Manuel Cipriano, inmate No. 470 of the Prison Carregueira, I confess that I tried selling my niece Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro.

Being true sign this confession.

Sintra 18, May 2009

Joao Domingos Manuel Cipriano. "

As has been expounded in the preceding paragraph of these pleadings, the confession of João Domingos Manuel Cipriano is essential, because itself is a true testament to the innocence of the Appellant to the murder of the Eleanor and daughter Joana. This is because João had always been just that incriminate co-authored by Leonor in the murder of the girl. It should be noted also that João confesses that he "tried to sell rather than sold. If he had stated that "sold" in this case would mean that the sale would have occurred successfully, and that Joana would not have been murdered by him, who denied Leonor. But João says he has sold, but that

"tried to sell, which is very different! Indeed, first assume that João tried to sell the child, and that the sale was never achieved! Now if it was not realized, that fate gave him the child as if he was responsible for its "attempt to sell"? Joana has been missing for almost five years. Having João"tried to sell the girl, it would be logical and consistent that only he knows the way and Joana's whereabouts, thus confirming the true confession of Leonor that, due to the failure of the" sale "that João organized, this came after the murder the girl and hide her body somewhere. Remember that João was already registered at a time, having been convicted on 10 November 1993, four years in prison for attempted murder (attempted to kill a person with a shotgun, in return for 20 stories and a motorbike and although it has not been successful, the shooting left the victim with a broken hand). In addition to this penalty, yet met by several other crimes, as testifying to his criminal record, the leaves contained 507 to 510 of Volume 2 of the file. According to several witnesses, including some listed in this Resource Review, João has never repented of the crimes they had committed, and even boasted of having already given a shot at a person. Moreover, in the long years he had already spent in prison, John had many opportunities to engage with the widest knowledge of nature related violent criminals, most probably also with those that opened the doors for the avowed "attempted sale" of Joana girl, very unfortunately his niece. Unlike the girl's mother, who had never before been convicted of any crime, and whose knowledge is restricted almost entirely to their neighbors and relatives. And he would soon be one of the latter the killer of her daughter Joana.

Another new document that puts forward new facts which confirm the outlines of the above confessions transcribed material, comes exactly a key witness who is perfectly aware of both the condemned, and which is in a secure and reliable position precisely by being a mother of two. Florinda Sundays is actually the progenitor of both the Applicant Leonor as his brother John And after knowledge of authentic confessions from both children, decided to proceed with the account of new facts that help us understand the truthfulness of those confessions and to corroborate several important respects. Resident in Great Hills, Municipality of Silves, Florinda Domingos wrote and signed the respective original document attached hereto, whose content is as follows (misspellings corrected):

Declaration

I hereby Florinda Sunday, carrying the Citizen Card 08717248, Mother of Maria Leonor Cipriano and João Domingos Manuel Cipriano, I come by this way declare that they know very well both my kids, and I swear that my daughter Leonor Cipriano never beat my granddaughter Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro. Also I swear by my honor that my granddaughter has always said the best mother and liked to live with it. Also knowing the interest that my son João Domingos Manuel Cipriano as I know, I know he could do anything to get money for drugs, because long before Joan a disappear he was not working and that was considered heavy consumers of a drug, not knowing exactly whether it was cocaine or heroin, but is certainly one of them. The João became very violent when they get the drugs and could even threaten me with death. Therefore I believe in the confession of Leonor Cipriano and João Cipriano, both my children when they confessed that my granddaughter Jane, daughter of my daughter Leonor, was tempted to sell by John finally believe that the confession of my son João Cipriano, 18 May this year, it's true and he is the João Domingos Manuel Cipriano solely responsible for the disappearance of Joana Cipriano my granddaughter for eight years. So I pray that justice is done and that my daughter Leonor Cipriano is released and my son João Cipriano pay for what he did to the girl.

Great Hills Silves

June 1, 2009

Florinda Domingos. "

Another witness heard earlier in the process, forward new facts through the new document he wrote and signed the original of which is annexed to this pleading. These facts again confirm the above statements were transcribed, and come from a completely independent person who has not at present any relationship with the procedural subjects, but at that time lived permanently with the Appellant and his daughter Joan, because when the girl disappeared already lived about 3 months with both in the same house (note that this witness had criminal involvement also against various elements of the Judicial Police, even against Gonçalo Amaral, the torture of a victim who was also at that time). In fact, Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva, currently residing at Rua Alfredo Keil, No. 12, 8400 Lagoa, declare as follows (misspellings corrected):

Declaration

I hereby Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva, a resident of Laguna, Rua Alfredo Keil, No. 12, 8400 Lagoa, I declare upon my honor that I lived with the missing girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, in the same house with her mother Leonor and her stepfather Leandro Figueira , about 3 months and never saw the mother hit the Leonor none of the children, because when I wanted to apply a punishment was always some who never passed for assault. We also declare that the mother Leonor was a calm person and unable to become violent is to be so. So I believe in the innocence of the Mother Leonor.

Pond June 5, 2009

Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva. "

Another important witness corroborated: the last person who guaranteed he was with Joan in public, then manager of Café Celia, where the girl was doing their last minute shopping before disappearing. Ofelia Maria Santos Gloria Zeverino, resident in District Che, Lot 14, Figueira, Portimão, knew well the child and his family, not only because these are their regular clients, but also for being a neighbor of the same and also for their youngest daughter , named Rachel, is a close friend of Joan, and both have almost the same age and playing almost every day with each other. In the original document here attached hereto, Ophelia Santos stated the following:

Declaration

I hereby Ofelia Maria Santos Gloria Zeverino, residing in District Che Lot No. 14 Figueira - Portimão, hereby declare that I who received the missing girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro Café "Celia" in the evening when she disappeared in September 12, 2004. He was also a neighbor of the girl, and I declare I never saw the mother of Joana, Maria Leonor Cipriano Sunday, beating his daughter. And I also declare, by also being true that the same girl and Joan's mother always said, even defending it in all circumstances.

Figueira June 2, 2009

Ofelia Maria Santos Zeverino Gloria. "

We reached the highest adult friend of Joanna. At the time owned the only supermarket Figueira (Alisuper "), Nidia Rochat was the person outside the family of Joana that most helped this child by offering him food, clothes, toys, taking it to the doctor, etc.., etc.. in short, doing the work that lay with the State: to help the needy. But as the state aid to non Joan nor her family, a kind heart and selfless moved and deleted so many of the difficulties that the family struggled. Fully cognizant of the child and their immediate families, Nidia Maria dos Reis Rochat, resident in the Street April 25, Lot 1, Figueira, 8500-130 Portimão, puts forward new facts through again wrote and signed that document, whose document is annexed to this pleading, and where one can read:

Declaration

I hereby Nidia Maria dos Reis Rochat carrier BI No. 8641202 issued on 18.05.2005 Lisbon, resident at Rua 25 de Abril Lot 1 Figueira 8500-130 Portimão, hereby declare that I knew well the missing girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, who I was very friendly, but also knew well his mother Maria Leonor Cipriano Sundays, so I can attest that the mother Leonor never knocked on his daughter Joan in my presence and never heard that he had done. I also declare that always said Joana Cipriano's mother Leonor very well and always maintained in all circumstances.

Figueira 02-June-2009

Nidia Rochat. "

Another witness heard already in the process now reveals very important new facts through the new document and who signed the original of which is here attached hereto. At the time Appellant's companion Leonor Cipriano, and stepfather of the girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, António Leandro David Silva, currently resident in the Street Evangelist Rosado Nunes, 14-1 º, Mexilhoeira Grande, 8500 Portimao, it clicks into place the pieces that were missing the disclose that his most recent testimony of true facts hitherto largely unknown (typos corrected):

Declaration

I hereby António Leandro David Silva, a resident of Street Evangelist Rosado Nunes, 14 / 1 Floor, Mexilhoeira Grande, 8500 Portimao, hereby declare and swear on my honor to be true all that I will describe below: I was the mother's partner the missing girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, Maria Leonor Cipriano Sundays, having lived with both for about six years. So I know them well and know that Leonor was unable to beat the children, something never done during all these years can not believe I was ever able to do it, because Eleanor was never a time that was violent or aggressive, for not being her temper. When our daughter Jane did something that Eleanor thought it was not done well, my mother hoped that fellow got home from work and talked with me so I spoke with Jane and if need be give him a punishment as not to see television or go to the room to do the homework. Joana's mother was very fond, and always told her nicely. I do not believe in any way that Leonor had beaten Joana at one time it was, let alone that the dead had popped. Also do not believe in any way that my partner Eleanor had had sex with someone other than me from the first moment we met,

much less with her brother João Cipriano Manuel Domingos. Can I say I believe one hundred percent in his confession on May 18 this year, when he finally admitted that he was solely responsible for the disappearance of Joana trying to sell it. Besides boasting of having tried to kill a man, John also used to produce violent behavior and aggressive when I had no money for drug and whenever someone said something he did not like much. This story of sex and Leonor have killed Joanna with John was invented by the Judicial Police and the two were forced to say exactly the same thing for the police to show work at any price. I was beaten several times in the PJ of Faro by Inspector Gonçalo Amaral and others who can not need, they gave me for several days punches and blows for me to say what they wanted, and was not convicted in court because only resist the beating that I was the victim. I believe that João never wanted to tell the truth about what he actually did to Joana, probably for fear of buyers, and it was discovered the girl's body there was evidence against him but against Leonor. I can testify that I heard also the Coordinator of Investigations Inspector Gonçalo Amaral trying to put João, Leonor against this saying that if he would incriminate Leonor lower down because instead of being just a guilty to killing two and the sentence would be divided . Two inspectors from the Judicial Police took João to the bathroom when I was there too and telling him to speak with the insistence that they had spoken, came to putting words in her mouth by insisting: "Leandro account here to have walked as #### with his wife, "and that João did not say anything and just after taking a kick from one of the inspectors who said it was true. Police have always refused to investigate the many rumors that went from mouth to mouth in Figueira that the girl would have been tempted to buy for criminals, citing a high capacity black car that was circulated in 12 days before Joana disappear. Finally I can also guarantee that on Monday September 13, 2004, João soon began to speak he had to go Figueira and shown to be very nervous and disinterested at the same time, very unselfish, so it could have happened his niece Joanna. Unlike Leonor my companion and mother of the girl who was very sad and upset about the disappearance of their daughter, and wept several times. Joao Figueira before fleeing called me to talk to me privately and told me: 'If your wife invents a story I come here to talk to her. " At the time when he told me that I did not understand how something suspicious and therefore did not give importance to such a sentence. But now, looking at everything and confession of Leonor and after the confession of João May of this year, I realize that João was afraid that Leonor told what he actually did to our daughter Joanna. I ask why Justice and that Leonor is released because he is innocent of the death of our Ladybug.

Portimão May-June-2009

António Leandro David Silva. "

Another decisive new evidence relates to a complaint filed by the wife of the then Coordinator of the Judicial Police Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral against her own husband, who only had knowledge of this year. This document, supported by another of the Office of the Police Headquarters (which was sent in later), the utmost importance, as it proves the personality violent, criminal and inhuman the maximum charge on the ground by the police investigations "If Jane," the then Coordinator Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral. In fact, credible and reliable source linked to the very Police (who have requested anonymity), made us get a full copy and exactly as the original of that complaint by the wife of Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, against her own husband, the Director Judicial Police in Faro on 23 December 2007. In this letter stand out serious allegations against the husband of his wife (then separate), including "insulting", "death threats", "driving police cars in visible state of drunkenness" and "danger to the integrity of a daughter of 4 years of age. " Confirming the authenticity of this document, we were then sent from the same source another new document, which is a true copy, full and exactly as the original, the Service Report Picket its Directorate of Judicial Police in Faro, from December 23 2007, where one can read on page 2: "It was given a picket line in this open letter by Mrs. Alexandra Sofia de Sousa Leal Manjua directed at Mr Deputy National Director, lic Guilhermino de Encarnação.." And that document is the Department of the Police Headquarters duly signed by the Coordinator of Criminal Investigation responsible, signed by Amável de Sousa, and also by the Inspector Salvado dos Santos. And, as the document of the Office of the Police Headquarters, this was an "open letter" of the wife of Gonçalo de Soousa Amaral, is well founded then the argument that can not be argued in any way that knowledge of such a letter would constitute "wanton privacy" or that this letter has no relevance to the process because it constitutes a public complaint against the wife of her husband, the severity of reported crimes is clearly evident and relevant for the proof of personality extremely violent and criminal actions of the then Coordinator of the Judicial Police Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral They join because they also attached to this pleading, both these documents, which here is attested true copies constitute, comprehensive and conform exactly the originals.

We can not because we admire the calamitous results of a criminal investigation to submit to a dangerous and violent alcoholic, even more catastrophic when we are dealing with very serious crimes committed against children, and for which there was only the late manifestly good sense to depart from the investigation when the alcoholic even returned to repeat the same coarse and unfounded attacks without a single proof against the mother of another missing child in the western Algarve (Madeleine Beth McCann).

For illustration, let us stress that it is totally implausible version forced by the then inquisitors of the Judicial Police, when we all know (and there is evidence in their case) that (1) the Appellant and his brother João had yesterday almost all in order to engage in sexual relations without the presence of the girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, because it stood the holiday in his mother's house of Antonio Leandro David Silva (Maria de Lourdes David), (2) have been collecting the child against his will, to 18 hours when the house of the parents of Eleanor arose a birthday party for another child, (3) sent the girl to shop for 20 hours, (4) as everyone knew, the walking route between the home of Joan and local purchases (Coffee Celia) took about 5 minutes, (5) after all, according to the version imposed by the inquisitors of the PJ, the Appellant and his brother John decided to have sex at that precise and very short space of time, through the living room and with all doors unlocked, knowing that the girl would return at any moment! It follows therefore absolutely clear that total inconsistency of this kind of pseudo criminal investigation and anti-science, itself a third world country.

Moreover, and as we can see by studying the file, even after just three days later the disappearance of Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro child, the Judicial Police in the document "Report of foreign diligence," so dated 15 September 2004 and leaves 84 of the 1st Volume of the case, concluded: "Given the advances in research [National Guard], must await the outcome of efforts made by the GNR of Lagos, because the evidence so far collected by that Police link to family quarrels. " That is, the Judicial Police itself continues to demonstrate a total disregard for the missing child even after having gone to such 48 hours recommended for initiation of criminal investigations by law a criminal. Moreover, the then responsible for investigating police jurisdiction (Judicial) Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral never undertook steps, appropriate and timely investigation to clarify what really happened to the girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, having neglected all tracks that pointed to an attempted sale by the child's uncle João Manuel Domingos Cipriano, and having discarded all the tracks that also pointed to what it had single-handedly killed the child and his body lying in one of the bins in the village Figueira, this possibility that the then Coordinator Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral always neglected without any plausible reason known, having just ordered the verification of landfill Porto Lagos two weeks after the girl's disappearance, when he was already clearly impossible to conduct searches in thousands tons of garbage accumulated however, mixed, collude and buried underground (as sheets 267, 268 and 269 of Volume 1 of the file). As if that was not enough, the same Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, without any evidence and just two months after the disappearance of Joana, sends an order to the Europol National Unit, which sends cease international search for the child, as can be read soon at the beginning of the document: "The 'disappearance' of the lower Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, 8 years old, has evolved into a framework by which murder is no longer interested in the spread of his whereabouts." (Leaves 973 of Volume 4 of the file). Apparently, or Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral took a course in criminal investigation in Guinea-Bissau or analogue country, or was driven by concerns for us as yet unknown in the sense that the truth was not yet discovered. As indeed found one of the most respected criminologists Portuguese [José Martins Barra da Costa].

It is noted further that the conviction was mentioned which is already very fragile and questionable from the standpoint of factual and legal, with the new evidence and facts presented here, combined with those that were considered in the process, completely debunking the total inconsistency, illogic and lack of true material and formal facts found in the same process without sustaining a single valid proof, and in absolute violation of the principle of presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 32 of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic and characterized with absolute binding legal force and direct applicability in terms of paragraph 1 of Art. 18, and even with limited material for review in accordance with subparagraph d) of Article 288, both also from the Portuguese Constitution. It is also noteworthy that since the blood was never found Joana Cipriano at his home (and even if it were, could result from a multitude of situations without any direct or

indirect relationship with a backdrop of murder), we can only conclude that the Court of facts was based solely on - unwittingly - in false indications of the investigation, including the false confession of the Appellant (obtained under torture) and, above all and mainly in the systematic lies of João Manuel Domingos Cipriano falsely indicated that the co authorship of homicide for the Appellant, which led to a reconstitution photographic and video that was shown, against all laws, in place of the trial, thus decisively influencing the subconscious of the Court of Jury (made up mainly of people from people who were already "brainwashed" by the other numerous lies disseminated by much of the media who published the swindlers and deliberate leaks perpetrated in flagrant breach of secrecy by "police sources").

Whether the Applicant thus proving that the eminent judges of the Supreme Court, Dr. Santos and Dr. Carvalho Costa Mortágua, losers who voted in the seat of an ordinary appeal, were absolutely right in stating categorically that the Appellant's conviction for murder of daughter Joana flagrantly violated the principle of presumption of innocence, was "illegal and unconstitutional" and could lead to a "serious and irreparable miscarriage of justice".

The seven original documents attached together in this pleading are fundamental and decisive new evidence that constitute most important new facts and secondarily the strengthening of other facts that had already been assessed in the process but not found by the Court declared the facts . Thus we have that:

(1) The Applicant Maria Leonor Domingos Cipriano confessed to January 15 this year what really happened to her daughter, denying any involvement in her death;

(2) The girl's uncle, João Manuel Domingos Cipriano, confesses finally on 18 May this year that he lied throughout the proceedings, to declare now that actually "tried to sell her niece Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro," and that he alone can then answer the consequent disappearance of the child after the frustration of the macabre business for yourself organized and carried out;

(3) Pay Attention is drawn to the fact that João Manuel Domingos Cipriano has nothing to gain legally with this confession, quite the contrary, it has lost since in which he confesses, in addition to the authorship of the murder of the girl, should also answer for the crime of human trafficking, specifically provided for and punished under Article 160, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Penal Code with imprisonment for 3-12 years;

(4) The mother of the Appellant and João (Florinda Sundays), after facing the last and true confessions of both, expressly states (on June 1 this year) who believe in them completely, as knowing very well their children and know that Leonor was incapable of hitting children, and that João was, instead, a very violent person who has even threatened her with death, and was still the same child a heavy consumer of narcotics that "he was able to do everything to get money for drugs ", stressing its strong finish certainly were aware of the facts (about the personality of both her sons) that is just the João Manuel Domingos Cipriano her son" solely responsible "for the disappearance of granddaughter Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro;

(5) Carlos Alberto Pinto da Silva, having lived for nearly three months in the house and with the Applicant, where he also resided Joana Cipriano, on 5 June this year also testifies that "Eleanor was a calm person and incapable of becoming is so violent it was "and that the Appellant never beat us no children, adds that can only believe in the innocence of Leonor Cipriano for the murder of the daughter Joana:

(6) Ofelia Maria Santos Gloria Zeverino, then owner of the infamous "Coffee Celia" Figueira and neighbor of the Applicant, and the mother of one of the great friends of the missing girl Joana Cipriano (Rachel, now 12 years old), supports all Earlier testimony presented here, to say on June 2 this year, which not only never saw the Appellant to beat his daughter Joan, as is always the mother and said, "defending it in all circumstances" (which would be Joan was extremely unlikely if not treated properly by the Appellant);

(7) A good friend's adult Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, Nidia Maria dos Reis Rochat, owner at the time of "Alisuper" Fig Tree (the only supermarket in town), also on June 2 this year, corroborates the testimony above described, adding even if they never even heard that someone had made a hit in the Applicant Joan (it follows logically that this witness is put aside, and well, the lies propagated by the inspectors of the PJ, considering the implication as inventions and falsehoods );

(8) Finally, the fellow then Applicant and stepfather of Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, António Leandro David Silva, provides, in testimony dated June 5 this year, the following very important evidentiary statements:

- "I was the mother's partner missing girl Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro, Maria Leonor Cipriano Sundays, having lived with both for about six years";

- "Know them well and know that Leonor was unable to beat the children, something never done during all these years can not believe I was ever able to do it, because Eleanor was never a time that was violent or aggressive because it is not her temper;

- "Joana's mother was very fond, and always told her nicely. I do not believe in any way that Leonor had beaten Joana at one time it was, let alone the dead had to slap";

- "I also do not believe in any way that my partner Eleanor had had sex with someone other than me from the first moment we met, much less with her brother João Manuel Domingos Cipriano;

- "I believe one hundred percent in the confession from him [João] on 18 May this year when he finally admitted that he was solely responsible for the disappearance of Joana trying to sell it;

- "Besides boasting of having tried to kill a man, John also used to produce violent behavior and aggressive when I had no money for drug and whenever someone said something he did not like very much";

- "I heard the Coordinator of Investigations Inspector Gonçalo Amaral trying to put João, Leonor against this saying that if he would incriminate Leonor lower down because instead of being just a guilty to killing two and the sentence would be divided";

- "Two inspectors from the Judicial Police took João to the bathroom when I was there too and telling him to speak with the insistence that they had spoken, came to putting words in her mouth to insist: 'account here as you went to Leandro to #### with his wife, "and that Jones did not say anything and just after taking a kick from one of the inspectors is that they said was true";

- "Police have always refused to investigate the rumors that went very word of mouth in Figueira that the girl would have been tempted to buy for criminals, citing a high capacity black car that was circulated in 12 days before Jane disappear";

- "Finally I can also guarantee that on Monday September 13, 2004, John soon began to speak he had to go Figueira and shown to be very nervous and disinterested at the same time, very unselfish, so it could have happened to his niece Jane ";

- "The João before fleeing Figueira called me to talk to me privately and told me: 'If your wife invents a story I come here to talk to her." At the time when he told me that I did not understand how something suspicious and therefore did not give importance to that phrase. But now, looking at everything and confession of Leonor and after the confession of John May of this year, I realize that John was afraid that Leonor told what he actually did in our daughter Joan. "

Also noteworthy is that Antonio Silva Leandro David has no interest in defending the Applicant beyond the interest of truth, for since this was jailed for nearly five years, has already had several other partners, with whom he has also lived under a union fact.

All these new facts and evidence, in correlation with the facts previously found by the Court of the facts are sufficient to generate serious doubts about the fairness of the conviction of the Appellant (elements or evidence is "evidence to substantiate probands any facts, either of which constitute the crime itself, both of which are indiciantes of existence or nonexistence of crime or its elements "- Cavaleiro de Ferreira in Review Criminal Scientia Iuridica, cit. by Simas Santos / Leal-Henriques in Resources Criminal Procedure, 5. nd edition, pp. 214/215..) And the law does not require certainty about the injustice of the conviction, but only questions, though serious issues (Ruling of Supreme Court of 03.07.1997, Proc. No. 485/97). And doubt on the fairness of the sentence covers all those cases where the defendant does not have to serve a sentence and that that would not have to be applied when deciding if the court had access to such facts (Ac. of the STJ 04/30/1990, Proc. No. 41,800). What in the face of new facts and evidence detailed above, and in correlation with the pre-existing, clearly call into question the fairness of the Appellant's conviction for murder of daughter Joana, doubts indeed so severe that it may acquit the Appellant Maria Leonor Domingos Cipriano practice (co-author) of the crime of murder, provided for and punished by Articles 131 and 132 paragraphs 1 and 2 a) and b) of the Criminal Code, with resultant legal requirement of not applying any penalty to Appellant.

Reinforcing all original documentary evidence offered here, a new one crucial test concerns the aforementioned complaint by the wife of the then Coordinator of the Judicial Police Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral against her own husband, who only had knowledge of this year. This document, supported by another of the Office of the Police Headquarters, the utmost importance, as it proves the personality violent, criminal and inhuman the maximum charge on the ground by the police investigations "If Joana," the then Coordinator Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral. Credible and reliable source linked to the very Police (who have requested anonymity), gave us a full copy and get exactly that same as the original complaint filed by the wife of Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral, against her own husband, the director of Faro Judicial Police on December 23, 2007. In this letter stand out serious allegations against the husband of his wife (then separate), including "insulting", "death threats", "driving police cars in visible state of drunkenness" and "danger to the integrity of a daughter of 4 years of age. " Confirming the authenticity of this document, we were sent from the same source another new document, which is a true copy, full and exactly as the original, the Service Report Picket its Directorate of Judicial Police in Faro, on 23 December 2007, where one can read on page 2: "It was given a picket line in this open letter by Mrs. Alexandra Sofia de Sousa Leal Manjua directed at Mr Deputy National Director, lic Guilhermino de Encarnação.." And that document is the Department of the Police Headquarters duly signed by the Coordinator of Criminal Investigation responsible, licensed Amaro de Sousa, and also by the Inspector Salvado dos Santos. And, as the document of the Office of the Police Headquarters, it is an "open letter" of the wife of Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral , is well founded then the argument that can not be argued in any way that knowledge of such a letter would constitute "wanton privacy" or that this letter has no relevance to the process, as constituting, as it constitutes a public complaint against the wife of her husband, the severity of reported crimes is clearly evident and relevant for the evidence of extremely violent and criminal personality of the then Coordinator of the Judicial Police Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral. They join because they also attached to this pleading, both these documents, which here is attested true copies constitute, comprehensive and conform exactly the originals.

Knowing that he Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral was the top manager and coordinator of field investigations of the Judicial Police "If Joana," as well prove the case, in which it turns out that this is the one who signs all the documents constituting such orders in the police investigation, and inspectors who are addressed in its internal documents (indeed as himself Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral said in an auto inquiry conducted by the Department of Discipline Inspection and the National Directorate of Judicial Police, this inquiry chaired by Dr. José Andrew Vaz, Director of the Department that, on November 15, 2004, where it Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral said that "is responsible under his guidance and investigation relating to crime investigation, with the NUIPC 330/04.02JAPTM, taking direct responsibility for their ownership, for reasons of investigative strategy. "), because we can not fail to understand why the truth was not found in the" If Jane ", and why the results absolutely unjust condemnation of the Applicant, when we measure that effectively Research of the Judicial Police was dispatched to a dangerous and violent alcoholic.

Important note to the above transcript excerpts of Extraordinary Appeal Sentence Review:

all documentary evidence cited were submitted with their appeal, and all statements, including the confession of John Dominic Manuel Cipriano, followed in their original, which was included in the original process, with no return to the applicant.

8
Violation of the Convention Against Torture by Portugal

The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading was adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by Resolution No. 39/46 of the UN General Assembly in December 10, 1984, with entry in force in the international order on June 26, 1987 in accordance with Article 27, paragraph 1. For Portugal, the signing took place on February 4, 1985, with approval for ratification by the Parliament Resolution No. 11/88 of 21 May, published in the Official Gazette, Series I, No. 118/88. The ratification was made by Presidential Decree No. 57/88 of 20 July, published in the Official Gazette, Series I, No. 166/88. The deposit of its instrument of ratification with the Secretary General of the United Nations took place on February 9, 1989, notice of deposit of instrument of ratification by Notice of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs published in the Official Gazette, Series I, No. 128/89, of June 5. The entry into force in the Portuguese legal system occurred on March 11, 1989.

The declaration recognizing the competence of the Committee against Torture under articles 21 and 22 of the Convention took place February 9, 1989.

In accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the Convention Against Torture, "the term torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for the purposes of, inter alia, obtain him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or press him or a third person, or for any other reason based on discrimination, since that such pain or suffering is inflicted by a public official or other person acting in an official capacity, the instigation or with his consent or acquiescence. ".

Rules violated by the Portuguese, for both Maria Leonor Domingos Cipriano, David Silva and Antonio Leandro:

Article 11
States Parties shall carry out a systematic monitoring of application of rules, instructions, methods and practices of interrogation, as well as the arrangements for the custody and treatment of persons subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment in any territory under their jurisdiction in order to avoid any cases of torture.

Article 12
Each State Party shall provide that its competent authorities proceed immediately to an impartial investigation, wherever there are reasonable grounds for believing that an act of torture has been committed in any territory under its jurisdiction.

Article 13
States Parties shall guarantee to persons who claim to have been subjected to torture in any territory under its jurisdiction has the right to complain to the competent authorities of those States, who shall immediately rigorous examination of the case. Measures should be taken to ensure the protection of complainants and witnesses against ill-treatment or intimidation as a consequence of the complaint or the provision of statements.

Article 14
1. Each State Party shall ensure that its legal system guarantees the victim of an act of torture the right to seek redress and to be compensated in appropriate terms, including the means for as full rehabilitation. In case of death of the victim as a result of an act of torture, the compensation will revert to the heirs.

2. This article shall affect any right of compensation to the victim or another person may have by virtue of national laws.

Article 15
The State Party shall ensure that any statement that may prove to have been obtained by torture can not be invoked as evidence in any proceedings unless it is used against a person accused of torture as evidence that the statement was made.

All rules above quoted were flagrantly violated by Portugal.

9
Conclusion

It is at this point make a few remarks in conclusion. We want, first of all make clear that the serious problems that take place in Portugal with regard to respect for human rights, not an exclusive of this country, but plentiful, in greater or lesser degree by most countries on Earth, as Honorable Members of the UN Committee well know. However, what particularly in revolt against the Portuguese State's case, is the sheer hypocrisy that characterizes the discourse and conduct of national governmental authorities, claiming on the one hand, Portugal as a rule of law that respects an exemplary human rights and producing laws that theoretically aimed at safeguarding the same, but on the other hand, in practice, we are witnessing, on the contrary, a systematic and gross violation of the generality of Human Rights by the agents of the state, with ever-recurring cases of police brutality, torture , a justice system flawed and manipulated by selfish corporate interests, and constant abuse of any kind against citizens in general, especially the most vulnerable such as women and children, in fact as well have denounced Amnesty International and the Portuguese Lawyers Association under the auspices of Dr. Antonio Pinto Marinho your Dean.
With the whole brutal malevolence that dominates the planet Earth, it is not surprising that prestigious NASA astronauts, such as Brian O'Leary, Major Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, among others, have repeatedly stated publicly that the extraterrestrial presence on Earth is a proven fact that has been intentionally hidden and the target of massive misinformation on the part of governments, and that there is a clear attempt by the morally superior extraterrestrial forces with the evil that has prevailed among the terrestrial population. And, as a result, governments have been forbidden ground, by those same forces, returning to the Moon A careful analysis reveals that there may be another explanation that the last trip and last trip to the Moon with crew beyond the "low Earth orbit "have occurred since more than 38 years by NASA's Apollo 17 in December 1972 and since then, despite frequent political speeches" promising "the return to the Moon (which until now was being sold by agencies American real estate!), and even a trip to Mars, this never came to pass. Like the astronauts, also NASA, Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, admitted, fearfully, in interviews with the media, having seen alien craft on the moon, however, despite these facts known by all those with an interest in know the truth, misinformation reigns, and ignorance, lies and stupidity are officially grown by most authorities as a way to keep the entire population under genuine slavish submission. And thus also not surprising that has been reported that it is common practice for many governments secretly hiring journalists to disseminate misinformation, such as Timothy Good explains in his book "Need to Know: UFOs, the military and intelligence", citing that the 70s of last century, were discovered only in the United States of America, about 400 journalists with agreements with the CIA to disclose, in various media, news manipulated. And even as the author points out, joining the already vast wealth of real information available publicly, as several press conferences in which witnessed dozens of professionals from many countries, including policemen, ex-secret service agents and High military reform, the same extraterrestrial forces remained under control stockpiles of nuclear weapons, preventing a nuclear war would destroy the entire planet in seconds. How many soldiers have explained, both in the U.S. and the former Soviet Union, extraterrestrial craft with capabilities that no ground unit can match up to today, flew often, military bases, nuclear weapons, disabling all the controls of arms by the staff military. That is, even if they wanted to fire a nuclear missile attack or retaliation for an attack, the earthly governments were unable to do so, at least while the alien craft were available to fly over those nuclear bases. It is clear that military personnel who witnessed several such instances was immediately threatened by the higher hierarchies to remain silent, and in consequence many of them only after they retire decided to reveal all they knew. Some cases were discussed in detail by The History Channel (History Channel), the documentary series "UFO Hunters", and in the documentary, the same series, entitled "Military vs. UFOs," is reported in detail the various raids extraterrestrial craft in two bases of nuclear weapons from Britain in 1980. Among the several witnesses who corroborated the successful, there is the Commander of one of these bases, Colonel of the tables in the U.S. Army Charles Halt (USAF Deputy Base Commander), now in retirement. Charles Halt, supported by the testimony of Nick Pope, a researcher at the Ministry of Defence United Kingdom (also now in retirement), has no doubts in stating that what he saw was not land, and that there was no reaction capability of military forces British and U.S. attended the highly developed technology. Of course all this is hidden by governments, and those who have the courage to speak are often subject to campaigns of defamation, disinformation and just, in most cases, prevail in mass media. For example, in that case the Commander Charles Halt, was aired by the government to the press that what had been seen was nothing but light reflected by a lighthouse that stood nearby. However, the team of the History Channel able to prove that the lights of this lighthouse could never have achieved the military base of Commander Charles Halt, particularly because, among other reasons, it was discovered that the lighthouse has since said the 70 had a metal plate in his back that prevented any reflection of light to earth.
Another example of misinformation brutal binds to the intentional adulteration of the word "pedophile." In fact, the media began using the term "pedophile" to describe child rapists, completely disregarding the true sense of the word, ie "pedo" child and "phylum" friend, that is, according to genesis of the word pedophile means, in fact, a friend of children. The intentional disregard the language takes care that, in the subconscious of the masses, a rapist of children is equated to a friend of children. What evil force two subliminal messages, apparently conflicting, but in fact complementary to each other: on one hand that a child rapist is a friend, so anyone connected to the "field of good, and secondly to be friends with children is something "bad." This deliberate confusion to force the masses to accept uncritically that subconsciously, after all, is not so bad to violate children because it may just be a normal act of "friendship," while at the same time instill the true friendship for one child may be something "bad." But, according to the true moral standards, inherently universal, both of these perverse reasoning are dead wrong. In fact, violating children is a huge eyesore and not an act of "friendship", but an act of extreme malice, but also, indeed, be truly a friend of children, is something very positive and commendable, an act of genuine goodness, because, as evidenced by all the best psychological studies, children need affection for your mental well-being. But planet Earth is still a planet ruled by monsters, and no wonder that, on this planet than the goodness to be ridiculed and fought against evil and praised and encouraged. The Earth History unequivocally proves these facts, a planet that has always been dominated by the most brutal violence. Well they are right at the Good Aliens do not want the land to spread their malicious malevolence off the planet!
And so we return more specifically the case of the disappearance of our lovely Joanna. Has always discriminated against by the state, brutally raped, the mother convicted of crimes they

did not commit, his uncle a murderer with imprisonment far below the enormous gravity of the crime he committed, the third parties involved in the attempted purchase of the child, for malicious purposes , with total impunity, and the criminal elements of the Portuguese, medieval torturers, to laugh at liberty to all the evil that helped make against Joan, her family and neighbors, here in Portugal its entrails!
And here we go rummaging through the issue of intentional adulteration of the word "pedophile." In fact, one of the people who helped Joan, the lady her adult neighbor and friend, the owner at the time, the only supermarket in the village of Figueira (the "Alisuper"), Nidia Rochat, the same lady who helped so many Joana times, thrilled with the sweetness of the child and his total lack of financial status. Offered her toys, clothes, food, took her to the doctor when she was sick, but all that earned him in this society of monsters that all the goodness that had to fall in with Joana such term "pedophilia." 'Was she a friend of children? After all, it helped her so much, it should be! So it must be a pedophile and go to jail! ": This highly perverse reasoning, launched and supported by governments immoral (involved in sexual abuse of children, of the kind alleged in the national scandal" Casa Pia ") and propagated by a media poor, meant that Nidia Rochat, instead of being praised for what he did, was publicly crucified by those who dominate society immoral. Earned her contemptuous lengthy interrogations by police, was seen as suspect, and came to be indicated in the newspapers as responsible for the abduction of the child! But the evil, honorable Members of the Committee Against Torture, the UN can not continue to reign on earth. Is in your hands, while you can, make this case a textbook example of a strong condemnation of immoral and criminal State, State responsible for destroying the lives of innocent children, and his true friends inside and outside their destroyed families.

10
Request Summary

It should, for proven, the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations, through its Committee Against Torture condemned Portugal for torture against Leonor Maria Domingos Cipriano and António Leandro David Silva, specifically for breach of Articles paragraphs 11 to 15 including the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading publicly urging the Portuguese government to immediately implement the Convention that is a signatory, punishing all the players involved in the torture of the plaintiffs, paying back all the damage and prejudice caused to both victims as provided in Article 14 of the Convention, and even reopen the proceedings on the disappearance of Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro child as a logical consequence of the provisions of Article 15 of the Convention Against Torture.

This document relates, for both plaintiffs stipulated by paragraphs 2 and 5 of Article 22 of the Convention.

Attached to this original document:
- Original litem signed by Maria Leonor Domimgos Cipriano;
- Original litem signed by Mr David Leandro Silva;
- Copies of various documents corroborating the alleged in the various sections of this document.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnqSy_DUwAw

The news about the United Nations procedure are already everywhere in the Portuguese press! (just search on Google for the exact phrase “Leonor Cipriano” results from last 24 hours).

I a falling on somebody's head and a waiting for a fat liar


MARCOS

I agree christabel.