J4's Response To Bennett.

by Rosie Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:41 am

What follows is not a critique of Bennett's ramblings, it is more to bring to the readers attention that Bennett seems to be unable to grasp reality and process factual information and to point out where he is telling blatant lies, I do not like liars, hence I do not like Bennett or his "pretendy" friend Amaral.
I start with this, if Bennett cannot even correctly name the person he is trying so desperately to undermine repeatedly making the same mistake, what hope is there of him getting anything else right? This has been brought to the attention of Bennett before - as I explained, Bennett seems to have a problem comprehending factual information, a bit of a major fault for a solicitor, no wonders then he only lasted five minutes and in those "five minutes" been disciplined and fined by the Law Society for gross professional misconduct and later thrown off the solicitors roll and been officially told he can no longer practice as a solicitor.
Quelling the urge to make my own response to Bennett just two words long, I'll get on with it. (sorry for the length of the post in advance)

Dr Marcos Aragao Correia is the name of the Madeiran lawyer, it is not Marcos "Alexandre" Aragão Correia and it never has been, I know the full name of Marcos and it is not this and Bennett has been informed about this on numerous occasions, it seems Bennett is ignorant as well as stupid. Correctly naming a Portuguese person is not only polite, it is essential for clarity and accuracy, however, those of us who have the misfortune to know of the disgraced ex-solicitor Anthony Bennett, also know that clarity and accuracy are not the forte' of this person, Bennett and the truth are diametrically opposed. Dr Marcos Aragao Correia is a public figure, so it is quite easy to check his correct name, but of course checking ones facts is not something that Tony Bennett does very often - if at all! His factually incorrect leaflets and booklets are his own testaments to that, which is why of course that Bennett is entirely wrong, misquotes and misrepresents the truth in almost every single thing he does and every band wagon he chooses to jump upon.
Bennett recently published yet another factually incorrect booklet, this time he maintains he has based this booklet on the files, but he has not, what he has done is base this "booklet" on the files according to the interpretation of a disgraced Portuguese ex police coordinator and convicted criminal perjurer Goncalo Amaral, who recently had his own appeal against the banning of his own libellous and factually incorrect book turned down. It beggars belief that Bennett has done this, but done it he has, not forgetting that Tony Bennett's first booklet and various numbered "reasons" leaflets are also the subject of a High Court injunction preventing him from distributing them and selling them for being libellous!
Goncalo Amaral himself is in trouble with Portuguese law because he has allegedly broken his country's own secrecy laws and is the subject of a criminal investigation. He based his book on files he could not possibly have read, as he was sacked from the Madeleine McCann investigation some 10 months BEFORE the files were made public. He also made mention of the "Gasper Statement" this in itself is puzzling because the Gasper statement was not taken until AFTER Goncalo Amaral was kicked off the case and demoted from his job as coordinator in Portimao. The secrecy order was lifted and the files made public AFTER Amaral published his book so how can he say his book was based on the files? How can he say the also banned DVD "mockumentary" was based on the files? It could not possibly have been unless a) Amaral stole files and took them with him when he took early retirement and for his own personal use (even so this does not explain how he came by the Gasper statement) or b) Someone from inside the investigation was passing him official secrets and classified documents abut the case, whichever or whatever it actually is, or whether it is an amalgamation of the two, Goncalo Amaral is plainly in the wrong and looks like he has broken the law, hence the criminal charges proceeding against him and this is what Tony Bennett has based his 2nd factually *INCORRECT* book on. Not good is it? To say nothing of the fact that Tony Bennett recently sold a banned booklet to a journalist thus breaking the High Court injunction and now libel lawyers Carter Ruck are in receipt of that evidence and it looks very much like Bennett is going to find himself in court facing costly libel charges (£50.000 of them), also remembering that breaking an injunction is actually classed as a criminal act! While his "buddy in crime" Goncalo Amaral is not only facing the charges mentioned above, he is also being examined by a judge at the moment to see if he will stand trial for the alleged torture of Leandro Silva, (a prosecutor has already classed this as worthy of putting this case before a judge for his/her consideration). Goncalo Amaral is also due in court in probably March 2010 to face a libel trial for £1 million, if all the trials were not tribulation enough, Amaral also faces an appeal over his conviction for his part in the now proven torture of a woman in his custody, if the appeal is denied (and under Portuguese law this is almost a certainty) he will be forced to serve out his 18 month suspended prison sentence and this is where it gets very tricky for Amaral, because if he is found to have violated the secrecy law, that is a criminal offence and he will be forced to serve his suspended sentence out in prison, does it end there? If only, no it goes much further and much deeper, if Amaral goes to trial over the alleged torture of Leandro Silva and is found guilty, losing £1.million from his bank accounts swollen by libelling the innocent parents of Madeleine McCann will be the very least of his worries, if he is found guilty it is I am afraid "Hi Ho, Hi Ho, it's off to jail he goes" to serve anything up to a 12 year prison sentence.
Now would it occur to Bennett and other Amaral supporters that this man Amaral is not unlucky, but more untruthful and most likely corrupt? Just how many cases has Amaral to be involved in all ending in controversy and obvious lies (As Hugo the Portuguese citizen who Amaral had extradited to Spain to stand trial for something Amaral knew fully well he did not do, as Hugo had many witnesses to testify his complete innocence. Amaral then in charge of the drugs squad knew this was a definite case of mistaken identity yet allowed this poor man and his family to be put through hell, so much so that a distraught Hugo made an attempt on his own life while incarcerated for some thing he did NOT do and what is more, Amaral knew he did NOT do it and yet still stood by and watched this poor man shipped out of his country and off to Spain to languish in a Spanish jail when Amaral knew perfectly he was innocent. The reason? It suited Amaral that this man was made a scapegoat as it allegedly helped cover up for some drugs barons! It took the Spanish police and the Spanish judiciary to sort out Amaral's mess and clear unconditionally Hugo and release him and return him home to Portugal. The charges and trials of Goncalo Amaral keep mounting up, there is a woman serving a 16 year prison sentence for something she almost certainly did not do, who many leading lawyers and judges in Portugal maintain her guilt was NOT proved beyond all reasonable doubt. (Incidentally, this is another thing that Bennett got wrong, he said that Leonor was serving a 25 year sentence, still he was only 9 years out) This case becomes even more staggering when you realise that this was another case of a missing child who is still missing and because of Amaral's alleged "fabricated" evidence, her mother was convicted, just like Amaral tried to do to Kate McCann, mother of missing abducted Madeleine McCann, it is official, oh yes, Kate was offered a plea bargain, admit to the death and concealment of the body of her own daughter and receive only 2 years in jail and her husband Gerry, can even keep his job! Only poor Leonor Cipriano was not educated and did not have the money to fight her case like Kate McCann did and Leonor has ended up in jail serving a sentence on what appears to be trumped up evidence which at the very best can only be describes as "circumstantial". Talking of Madeleine, the McCanns and Amaral how can Amaral say this
"crucially, he went beyond that to expound his basic thesis on the case
- namely, that in his opinion, the evidence as a whole tended to show
that Madeleine had died in Apartment 5A, rented by the McCanns for that
fateful week of 28 April to 5 May 2007.
This is an absolute joke as one of our most observant members asked, how can it be quoted what the evidence said "as a whole", because no one knows if Madeleine is alive or not, something Amaral's own chief witness made testament to; so the notion of evidence whole or otherwise simply does not exist, if it cannot be proved that Madeleine has died, it follows then that it cannot be proved that the McCanns hid her body, and on this one point alone, Amaral's whole case came crashing s down. The point our astute member also makes is this and I quote:
how can he say that evidence as a whole suggests she died in the apartment, when the evidence as a whole was not investigated?? It was ignored
. And she asks Bennett if he doesn't find that just a bit contradictory?! Our member is of course referring to the dossier mentioned by another of Amaral's witnesses, Ricardo Paiva. This dossier now obtained by the McCanns libel lawyer Dra Isabel Duarte is jammed full of information from sightings to statements and photographs, all of which may have proved vital in the search for Madeleine, but were NOT investigated, they were placed in this file marked "Irrelevant To The Investigation". The leads allowed to go cold and the probably the abductors allowed to slip away with this child, the question any sensible and right minded person would ask immediately is why? Why did Paiva do this? Again another contradiction how could Paiva say he would reopen the investigation if new evidence came in, when he has systematically FAILED to investigate any evidence coming into the still shelved investigation? You cannot look for a child with closed eyes and you cannot say no new evidence has come in, if you are not examining and investigating the new evidence. It is most shocking, any normal person who cared for this small child and really wants to know what happened to her, would be outraged at this, but however, Bennett and Amaral and their erstwhile followers are not normal, they are both defunct and are certainly now debunked, they are a disgrace and Bennett is every bit a disgrace to the UK as Goncalo Amaral is to Portugal.
And this Goncalo Amaral is the person who Anthony Bennett based not only his first (now banned and libellous book) on, but also his second!
Bennett said that Amaral's investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann caused "embarrassment to Portugal" he got that right at least, the shenanigans of Goncalo Amaral has caused major embarrassment to Portugal, his incompetence, his criminal convictions, his libellous rantings, his appalling and blatant money making by using the name of a child he systematically failed, while abusing her parents human rights and good names, is a major embarrassment to every single person and child in Portugal. He has also made Portugal look a laughing stock that they would allow this "corrupt cop" near this investigation in the first place and that they did not reign him in sooner. It is not "dark forces" that is doing for Amaral now, it is the "light" of the truth and all of Amaral's shady past is catching up on him, from being exposed to having over half million euros of debt, to living a lifestyle his PJ pay could not hope to cover, to allowing himself to becoming embroiled in all of this and now his "surreptitious" past is catching up on him, he is trying to use the McCanns to get out of it, by accusing them of persecuting his family (yes you read it right) and then using free speech and democracy, knowing fully well how emotive these two things are to the average Portuguese citizen, it is a disgrace and one it looks like Amaral is not going to get away with. Amaral accused the McCanns of persecuting his family, this is an astonishing accusation, the McCanns did not force Amaral to write his libellous garbage in a book and publish it, he did this all by himself, it has been Amaral who has hounded the McCanns with his lies and unproven accusations at every twist and turn, in fact the McCanns gave him every opportunity to stop this behaviour, but instead he took their inaction for guilt and he became bolder and bolder and his accusations became so hurtful and widespread that he actually frustrated and impeded and hindered their search for their little girl. What Amaral is really objecting to is nothing to do with free speech, he is objecting to being prevented from falsely accusing two innocent people and being prevented from making money out of their misery and their abducted daughter.
The mention of money (certainly the root of all evil when it concerns both Amaral and Bennett) brings me to the most insane accusation and factually incorrect piece of nonsense in "Bennett's response" I am not going to be drawn into the arguments and the accusations that Bennett has decided to make against the governess of Odemira prison and the medical director, suffice to say that they are libellous in the extreme and those libellous accusations are for others to deal with, as I suspect they will be in due course. Bennett should understand that making wild unsubstantiated accusations like that will not do his "friend" Amaral any good, in fact they will only make things a lot worse for him. (If that is possible!)
Bennett is trying to somehow blame the McCanns for the speed of the Portuguese justice system! I point out to Bennett that the delay actually benefits Amaral and not Leonor Cipriaono, who may benefit once Amaral's appeal is heard and his conviction upheld by a retrial, but finds herself at the mercy of unpaid jurors and because of this an appeal that cannot progress. I would suggest to Bennett if he has these grumbles with the Portuguese justice system that he contacts those responsible, which by the way is not Kate and Gerry McCann.
Bennett seems now to be trying to pick a fight with a lawyer he does not even know or understand the correct name of, but if he hopes to draw this man, he will fail. Marcos regards Bennett lower than dog muck on his shoe, and Bennett is certainly no match for Dr Marcos Aragao Correia, especially as Bennett has displayed some alarming ignorance on the Cipriano case, but to all those that Know of Bennett, we understand that his ignorance of the law and his just plain old ignorance and arrogance, is just par for the course with him.
Dr Correia has much more important things to do than to worry about the likes of the failed disgraced ex solicitor, Tony Bennett. The "controversial" career of Marcos that Bennet refers to, is controversial only because Dr Correia has managed to obtain a conviction on Bennett's fallen hero Goncalo Amaral and of course neither Bennett or Amaral like this very much, so what do they do? Invent things and try to sling dirt and make dirty, facts that are in the public domain and that have always been in the public domain, facts that Marcos has never tried to cover up.
What has really angered Amaral and Bennett is the fact that Marcos, has never charged Leonor Cipriano or Leandro Silva one cent for representing them, he does this for the greater good and both Bennett and Amaral cannot say this, they have to put their hands up to making dirty deals, accepting donations from pensioners and selling factually incorrect libellous booklets, leaflets and books and DVDs. If accepting the price of airplane ticket (declared) to visit Leonor Cipriano in prison was all that both Amaral and Bennett could be accused of then they would have no problem at all, however they can't, because the pair fof them have and are still making money out of using Madeleine McCann and persecuting her parents and they can deny this all they like. but it stands up legally. Dr Correia has never made a secret out of the fact that he was paid some expenses by Metodo3 initially to investigate the disappearance of Joana Cipriano, in fact he told several newspapers about it, since they were interested in Joana's disappearance and wanted this work done is not illegal and it was not clandestine like Bennett is trying to make out either, but a few hundred euros against Amaral's millions made out of an innocent child and Bennett's "thousands" made out of selling libellous booklets and leaflets about Madeleine, pale into insignificance. the truth of the matter is that since then Dr Marcos Aragao Correia has represented Leonor Cipriano and Leandro Silva completely free of charge, in fact Marcos has paid to represent the couple out of his very own pocket, since they are poor they cannot afford to pay him and unfortunately the Portuguese legal aid system works against them paying Marcos for his services, so Marcos does it for nothing and this is of course a great source of embarrassment to the money grabbing natures of both Amaral and Bennett.
Leonor Cipriano has never changed her story 14 times, Bennett is again demonstrating his incapability of sticking to the truth, he is in fact lying through his back teeth as per usual, or demonstrating his complete inability to grasp the facts or to understand the law, or all of the above! Leonor Cipriano has changed her story because she tried to correct the false confession that was extracted from her after she was tortured, beaten, punched and kicked and a plastic bag placed over her head *WTHOUT* her legal representation present! This is not what I say, it is not what Marcos says, it is what has been proved in a court of law! Leonor Cipriano beaten Black and Blue below. Take a look, this is the torture that Tony Bennett is trying to defend!
The banning of Amaral's book was obtained by a judge and twice since that first injunction was granted Amaral has appealed and lost, the latter done with as much publicity as Amaral could possibly have wished for and his appeal was still turned down. In fact Goncalo Amaral should thank the McCanns for allowing this to be a civil and NOT a criminal case, if they (as is their right) decided to press criminal charges against Amaral, they could have invoked the Portuguese secrecy law and Amaral would have been denied the attention and publicity he so seeks, instead the McCanns did him a favour and went civil instead of criminal. (Perhaps before Bennett tries to libel and besmirch Dr Correia, he may like to be sure of his facts first and actually take the time to learn about the law in Portugal before shouting his large fat mouth off?) Just a thought! Amaral has been given ample chances to raise objections to the banning of his book , he has raised them and he and they have failed - comprehensively - twice!
The banning of the book and the documentary and copyright being granted to the McCanns is NOT oppressive, under the circumstances, it is the most logical and lawful thing to do. The whole idea of bringing this action is to further prevent Amaral from cashing in the libellous accusations he has written in his book and on their daughter's name, that is not oppressive, that is their right under the law. This has been testified against twice by Amaral and lost twice, except for some fine tuning that Judge Rodrigues carried out last week when upholding the ban on Amaral's book. There is nothing secret about it and Bennett needs to study his law before making further silly statements like that.
Amaral cannot make millions of euros out of a missing child and have access to that money for all of this time and then start carping about how much his defence costs, he must have known this was coming, why did he not prepare for it? Besides, he has got Joana Morais surfing the internet begging money from pensioners to give to the euro millionaire for his defence fund, why should he sell his £60.000 Jaguar motor car to pay for his defence?
Er no Bennett, Leandro Silva's trial does NOT depend on the testament of Leonor Cipriano, you are wrong yet again (for goodness sake do some research) I am not arguing this, you'll find out soon enough. Why does Bennett think it is OK to give these ridiculous opinions about things he obviously knows absolutely nothing about? And Leonor is not a proven serial liar, in fact Leonor has been proven to have been telling the truth - a court and judge agreed! The only serial liars around here are proven and "CONVICTED" liar Goncalo Amaral and proven libeller and lia Tony fat head Bennett. Of course the case against Amaral has been filed by Dr Marcos Aragao Correia, you fool Bennett, why wouldn't it be? Marcos is their lawyer you idiot, who does Bennett think it would be filed by? The bloody milkman? lol You got that right Amaral was found guilty in a court of law of falsifying a document to cover up a torture of a woman, a torture carried out on a small woman by approximately five large thugs! I would say that was pretty damning against Amaral and his non existent integrity, would you?
No one is paying Dr Marcos Aragao Correia, which is one of the reasons why he could not leave Madeira to appear for Leandro Silva, he did not have the funds to make the journey. There is NO fund for Marcos to represent Leonor and Leandro, Marcos does this out of his own pocket, alien as this is to Bennett, it is in fact true!
Thanks for the advert Bennett, I do hope the people (other than your followers like not so happygirl, laffin assasin and pukie Photon etc etc) when they come here and view the response to your catalogue of lies, realise what a complete untruthful, surreptitious person you are Bennett and not only that realise what a complete waste of space you and your deliberately misleading untrue accusations actually are, so thanks for giving me the chance to explain and hopefully while they are here they can also have a look around the forum and judge for themselves how we operate. I am not ashamed of this forum and our members and I am certainly not ashamed of our support for two innocent people who are desperately trying everything they possibly can to find their daughter, while being, vilified, persecuted, harassed and stalked and libelled by people like you Bennett. We are proud of what we stand for on this forum, so thanks again for giving me the chance to explain and reiterate this.
I know Bennett is a stranger to the truth, but on this forum we pride ourselves by telling the truth and we do exactly what it says on the can, all open and all transparent and we all do it voluntarily, we do not charge, we do not receive any money and we do not ask for donations of any kind, whatever we do on here is done absolutely and 100% free of charge, what a pity that Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral cannot say the same! we do what we do to support Kate and Gerry McCann, we dispel the lies spread by people like Bennett and Amaral and that is why they attack us and this is why they do not like us.
Not once in that ridiculous response has Bennett mentioned the right of little Madeleine McCann to be found and returned home, the true facts are this is because Madeleine McCann means less to Bennett and Amaral today than when she was first abducted.

by maria Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:53 am

, Rosie

by Pedro Silva Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:08 am

by vee8 Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:10 am

A true pleasure to read, unlike the long, coma-inducing diatribe from bennett!

by May Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:41 am

Wow! Brilliant, just brilliant! J4's Response To Bennett. 985497

by bluj1515 Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:33 am

Good job, Rosie, he hopes to bore people into submission with his long diatribes, and you were able to pick it apart point by point.

by dianeh Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:39 am

Well done.

J4's Response To Bennett. 215642

by Rosie Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:46 pm

Thanks to you who took the time and trouble to read and comment on my opening post, I know it was long but it was unavoidable if I was to take Bennett's lies apart, I did consider giving him a two worded reply, something about going forth and multiplying, but I thought better of it.

It takes a great amount of time and energy to write something like that, especially when you are feeling under the weather, but no way was I going to allow that imbecile to keep getting away with his lies.

Lies like his are what has damaged the search for Madeleine, I do not know how the lying moronic creep can live with himself and often wonder if his is a mirrorless house, but then I realise it couldn't be, there is no need, even if Bennett did stand in front of a mirror there would be no reflection! He is a truly vile evil souless person, who thinks nothing of sucking the metaphoric life blood out of people for his own profit, gain and pleasure.

I wait for the day when he receives a summons to court for breaking the terms of his injunction, I wait for the day he is found guilty, personally as well as fining him £50.000, I hope they put him in prison, he deserves it, he is a nasty lying conniving imbecile, if I referred to him as some kind of pond life, i think that is an insult to pond life!

by Sabot Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:00 am

I wish he was an imbecile, Rosie, but there is something far more nasty about him than that. And he knows exactly what he is doing.

He seeks to influence opinion by lying and twisting what little information there is. And I don't think for a minute that he even believes in what he says.

I think he's got a nasty case of Megalomania and needs to prove that he can decide what shall be.

But we all know what happens to Megalomaniacs in the end.

by Peaceful1 Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:30 am

Rosie, well said. I read every word unlike bennetts drivel.
It's so true, we stand here, together, supporting two innocent people who are desperately trying to find their daughter. We dont do it for money, none of us get paid, we do it because we are truly compassionate people.

by clairesy Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:22 pm

well done rosie,

one thing that as stood out to me,and probably because i have often been a bit weary of the files,is that you pointed out bennet as based his new leaflet/book on the files.The files that are compiled together and based on the theory of gonc so cannot be taken as truth anyway.

If that's the case (which of course it is)even the stuff we talk about and hold as truth should be questioned.Everything in those files (apart from the statements) is goncs words,goncs work and goncs theory.

I dont hold much hope for the files being accurate at all.To be honest the whole case needs to be investigated from the very very start.And i 6hink the reason the files were so delayed reaching the mccanns in the first place was because gonc had to try and put them into some sort of deluded order for them.

We have no where to get facts from in the files because they cannot be taken as fact can they?Nothing thats written in the files is 100% fact,its all a load of goncswallop

by Catkins Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:38 pm

Rosiepops wrote:Thanks to you who took the time and trouble to read and comment on my opening post, I know it was long but it was unavoidable if I was to take Bennett's lies apart, I did consider giving him a two worded reply, something about going forth and multiplying, but I thought better of it.

It takes a great amount of time and energy to write something like that, especially when you are feeling under the weather, but no way was I going to allow that imbecile to keep getting away with his lies.

Lies like his are what has damaged the search for Madeleine, I do not know how the lying moronic creep can live with himself and often wonder if his is a mirrorless house, but then I realise it couldn't be, there is no need, even if Bennett did stand in front of a mirror there would be no reflection! He is a truly vile evil souless person, who thinks nothing of sucking the metaphoric life blood out of people for his own profit, gain and pleasure.

I wait for the day when he receives a summons to court for breaking the terms of his injunction, I wait for the day he is found guilty, personally as well as fining him £50.000, I hope they put him in prison, he deserves it, he is a nasty lying conniving imbecile, if I referred to him as some kind of pond life, i think that is an insult to pond life!

You have far more patience than me Rosie.................Bet Bennett HATES the fact that you are on his tail.........
J4's Response To Bennett. 985497

Keep it up........

by Rosie Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:44 pm

Do you know Clairesy, I think there is a lot of truth in what you say, the files are some kind of huge thesis, there is nothing proven in them so really, they cannot be judged as anything else. This is one of the reasons why Amaral's appeals against his book ban will always fail and why he will lose the libel trial due to start against him, it has nothing at all to do with free speech or democracy, it has everything tod with accuracy and fact and that is where Amaral loses each and every time!

The only thing I tend to give time to, are those statements made by people who have signed them and put their names to them and other parts that have checked out with investigation. However, where there has been translation, especially those translations that have been carried out by the anti Madeleines and those that have been translated by Robert Murat who was subsequently made an arguido, well we have to be ultra careful about them too. Chris, Tinks and myself have uncovered some translations carried out by anti-Madeleines that have not be the truth, they have not been factual, it takes time and trouble and effort to go over these files, but we try to do this before we put them up here to be as sure as we can that what we are publishing is fact and not someone else's slanted fiction.

This whole investigation from the very first phone call to Amaral, where Amaral point blank REFUSED to leave his drinking and his drinking pals, to come and do his job and to take control by attending the scene of a major crime of abduction of a little girl unfolding on his patch, has been an utter shambolic farce, beset by fatal errors and and utter imbecillic incompetence!

There needs to be a review of this case, it needs to happen now and the case needs to be re-opened officially and:

Ricardo Paiva should be sacked!

by Chicane Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm

Fantastic job Rosie.

by Pedro Silva Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:19 pm

Paiva should be sacked immediately, sack him now.

by maria theresa Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:37 pm

Wow, Rosie!! Brilliant. Wonder how many will attend the "meeting" at the end of the month.

by Peaceful1 Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:32 am

the tony bennett roadshow? J4's Response To Bennett. 396948

That man loves himself so much doesnt he?

by maria theresa Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:10 pm

Yes, he might need to take a mirror if he wants to "meet" somebody!

Well, I expect there will be a tiny number of oddballs who attend.

I do think it's dawning even on the few skeptics that it was always a preposterous idea that the things Amaral accuses the McCanns of could possible have happened. Quite apart from the fact that there has never been any evidence, that there was neither time nor opportunity, could anyone seriously imagine that they would have continued to focus police attention on the search, to select more and better private investigators, to remind the world about Madeleine, to petition the Government to attempt to work with Portugal to reopen the case....if they had been in any way guilty of any involvement in her disappearance. Utter nonsense.

Why can't these people see the obvious? Or maybe they do but are simply malicious?

They pile grief on grief for Kate and Gerry. Without a scrap of evidence. Outrageous. Should they be allowed to meet and say the things they say? What about the law on inciting hatred? Isn't that what they are doing?

by May Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:45 pm

Hahaha he could be Tony Nomates!

by Sponsored content

J4's Response To Bennett.

J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.

Re: J4's Response To Bennett.