Who Do You Think You Are Kidding Mr Amaralol?

amaral to request to see the President and new evidence


by DCB1 » 9:38 am Thu Sep 17, 2009 17 September 2009
Gonçalo Amaral: An interview with Semanário Privado

“The apprehension of my book only gives me more strength to discover the truth about the Maddie case”


Pity you did not have the same level of commitment before you got the sack from the case, at the time you were found to favour 3 to 4 hour booze filled lunches instead of searching for Madeleine!


Gonçalo Amaral is going to request the political parties and the Republic’s President an audience, after his book “Maddie – The Truth about the Lie” was ordered apprehended by a judge at Lisbon’s Civil Court. The former inspector thinks that freedom of expression is under threat, at a time when new facts concerning Maddie’s disappearance may come to light

by José Leite

How do you comment on the apprehension of your book, “Maddie – The Truth about the Lie”? Do you think there’s the “hand” of the McCanns in this? Has the book started to be apprehended from the stores?


My comment is a concerned one, as an author and as a citizen who still holds his full civil rights. I remind you that I left the PJ in June last year, in order to recover my freedom of expression and that, 15 months later, they want to strip me of that freedom.

Would that be the same "freedom of speech" you afforded the McCanns? Where you leaked bizarre stories and unfounded allegations and gagged them with a secrecy order so they could not defend themselves? The exact same secrecy order that you (Amaralol) evoked when you did NOT have to?

The “hand” is evident: those persons filed the request for the injunction. I have no idea if the book has started to be apprehended, the fact is that it hadn’t been sold for months and now it seems to be sold out.

Even the thick Amaralol would have to have got this one right, of course their hand was in it, they applied to have his book of lies injuncted - what a really stupid question!

How many copies have been sold?

I don’t know the number of copies that have been sold, it seems that those persons know more than I do, they must hold privileged information.

Try asking your publisher thicko

If your appeal wins, do you intend to sue the judge who prohibited the sale of your book, and the McCanns, over the damages?

If it wins? Yeah right in his dreams.

As you know, it is not yet possible, in this democratic, lawful country,



Sorry for laughing, it is just that I found funny Amaralol using the words democratic and lawful!



to notify judicial decisions through the media, at least when those affect and restrict fundamental rights. I will not pronounce myself about the illustrious judge, because I respect, obey and believe in the judicial system,

Oh please stop it, please I can't take anymore! Amaral respects and believes in the judicial system?!!!!


and mainly because I do not know the fundament and the contents of the decision

Hmmm That's obvious!

As far as the authors of the injunction are concerned, I will exercise my rights, whether in a civil or in a criminal court.
Look forward to it, I like seeing you humiliated

When you mention limitations on the freedom of expression in Portugal, are you solely referring to your case, or also to other recent cases, like that of TVI? Or the processes that were filed against “bloggers” who disturbed the socialist power, especially José Sócrates?

It’s not me that says it, it’s the politicians who speak about an asphyxia of democracy in this 21st century Portugal, 35 years after the [revolution of the] 25th of April. There are limitations to the freedom of expression, there are journalists who are prevented from informing, this is a tragic reality. On the other hand, I do not point my finger at any specific party, the limitations come from those in power, who are possibly disturbed by the objectivity and the freedom that assists those who write and who have the duty to inform. As an attentive citizen, my opinion is that the concentration and the monopoly of the media have prompted a crisis and are limiting the freedom of information, of opinion and of expression. The journalists have become employees of corporations, more interested in profit than in informing (maybe not in its entirety, but it is close).


Waffle waffle, waffle waffle (ssshhh he doesn't know, but he is too embarrassed to say)

Has anyone at the PJ shown his or her solidarity with what has happened to you?

My friends stand with me. As far as others are concerned, it needs to be recalled that the PJ, just like other institutions, is going through an electoral period and some fear changes, therefore no major solidarity should be expected from there.

In other words.....NO!

(They all think he is a lying bent corrupt convicted criminal who is giving them all a bad name, which is why they did not even bother to say goodbye on the day he left!)

When will the English version of the book be launched?

It will be launched, that is all that I can tell you right now.

NEVER!

Do you think it was a mere coincidence, the fact that the judge who decided over the apprehension of your book was the same who condemned the Portuguese State to pay 131 thousand euro of compensation to Paulo Pedroso?

I trust the judicial system and its independence, therefore I’m not commenting on the coincidence, which is probably just that, but we are attentive.

Another silly question! He doesn't want to diss the judge you numpty, it is the same one who is going to hear his appeal against the injunction order!

Don’t you think that there is a personal persecution against you, after you saw your pretension to run for mayor for the Algarve’s PSD, dismissed?

That’s a good question. Two or three days before the president of PSD vetoed my name, the now author of the injunction was in Lisbon. According to what is being said, he met with his then lawyer and with a politician from that party. We are interested in confirming said meeting and its relation with the decision that affected my civil right to be elected.

Oh dear tell the truth Amaralol, it was dismissed because you are a convicted criminal and a liar and perjurer serving an 18 month suspended prison sentence and you will soon stand trial for torturing and battering another witness.

What hidden interests – masonry, national and international political lobbies – are moving in order to set you up?

I’m not a fan of conspiracy theories, there may be coincidences concerning the people who are trying to destroy me, but on the other hand, I have been receiving support from people who are connected to the masonry. I do not believe in any concerted effort to destroy me, this is something personal, not organised.

Amaralol is not a fan of conspiracy theories? Oh come on you liar, you started most of them off!

Should Maddie’s parents worry about the fact that Gonçalo Amaral mentioned that he is going to continue, in private, to investigate the case of the disappearance of little Maddie? What passage of your book may have disturbed them most?

The authors of the injunction are worried about the fact that I am a rather experienced criminal investigator.

As I said earlier, pity you didn't put some of that experience to use instead of quaffing wine and bear and fish in leisurely 3 to 4 hour lunches, paid for by the Portuguese tax payer, instead of doing the job you were employed to do, investigate a serious crime of abduction of an innocent child.

My book tells about that experience and knowledge. Many books have been published about the little girl’s disappearance, some more aggressive and more violent, but written by journalists, and they were not targeted by any injunction. The authors of the injunction fear my knowledge and my experience.

Hey hang on, did you just mention earlier that you adhere to the "illustrious judge, because I respect, obey and believe in the judicial system ?"

So tell us why are you breaking that injunction by talking about your filthy book of lies for wallies, when you were specifically 'ORDERED' not to by the "illustrious judge"?

One of the new facts that have already been revealed by our newspaper – and that was also mentioned during the McCanns’ interview with Oprah Winfrey – concerns a blanket that disappeared from the Ocean Club and that, allegedly, was used as a shroud during a funeral. Could that be one of the worries for those who persist in preventing the discovery of the entire truth about what happened to little Maddie?

I’ll explain: this child, like so many others of her age, slept with a certain blanket and with a certain soft toy. During that interview that you mention, the interviewer spoke to the mother, saying that she knew about her concern in knowing if the abductor covered her with “her blanket”. So far, nothing much. Now notice this, the blanket was left behind when the disappearance happened. There is documentation that proves that it was not taken with her, and there is no known testimony saying that it was seen when she was being carried away in a man’s arms.
What is being asked is the following: Was this a gaffe by the interviewer? Was “her blanket” the one that was left behind? How did “her blanket” go back to the child? These are the questions that need an answer and at the very least, they may indicate that there is something wrong.

Would this be the same pink blanket which was pictured on Madeleine's bed after she was abducted? The same one that *YOU* lost? (accidentally on purpose?) You tell us Amaral, how did the blanket go back to the child, MORE you numbskull, how do you KNOW it went back to the child? I heard Kate McCann talking about a blanket to keep her warm and comforted, she did NOT mention this blanket, the one *YOU LOST*.

Is there any other fact in the process that should be investigated further?

Yes. To find out why the soft toy that the little girl used the most – and that was later used by Kate McCann in all of her public appearances – was washed before the sniffer dogs, that are experts in detecting cadaver odour, arrived in Portugal.

Amaralol you had 71 days that is SEVENTY ONE DAYS, with which to have cuddle cat forensically examined (again), it was YOUR investigation why didn't YOU seize it before? Surely you could have arranged this between your lunches and tea breaks, with former Portuguese F1 racing drivers and driving to pick up you daughter after drinking heavily for hours? Come on now, you could have at least done some work!

Do you continue to defend that the key to the mystery lies in Aldeia da Luz?

We have no doubts whatsoever. That is where the little girl disappeared from and where she was seen for the last time. A reconstruction is still necessary.

Well we all know where she disappeared from and when she was last seen, but try telling Bennett that, he thinks it was May 1st!

Speaking about that, any ideas why you didn't bother to turn up at the scene and organise the investigation putting into practice the procedure for missing abducted children? Where were you exactly Amaralol?

As for the reconstruction, why is a reconstruction needed so it can sit collecting dust on the shelf? If you said the reconstruction was going to be televised, then the McCanns would have agreed but no, it was for nothing.

Also at the time Madeleine disappeared you were approached by the UK BBC TV programme Crimewatch, who offered to make a reconstruction but YOU DECLINED, so if you wanted a reconstruction and at a time when it could have actually done some good, why did you REFUSE it?

Does this episode of the veto on the book give you strength to proceed with your investigation, or to publish more books about this case?

They want to destroy me. They started out by attacking my good name, my honour and my professional pride. Now they want to attack my patrimony, apart from affecting my civil rights, the freedom of expression and of opinion. What is still left is freedom and life, will the next step be an attack against those? I have reasons to be afraid, but they won’t shut me up, and this sad and worrying episode will give me strength to proceed and to contribute towards the discovery of the truth and the fulfilment of justice. God protect me, but they won’t shut me up.

Give it a break, you are destroying yourself with you drunken lies and bizarre claims and books and charging people £80.000 per interview. Talking of money, how much are you being paid for this interview?

Not to mention the way you are using Madeleine's name to make yourself into a millionaire and then splashing it out on brand new Jaguar luxury cars, while most of your fellow citizens are struggling to make ends meet in a global recession! Shame on you!

Shut you up? I wonder how much noise you can make from inside a prison cell?

Attorney General receives information that may reopen the Maddie case

We have been informed that psychologist Paulo Sargento, a regular commentator of the Maddie case on television, has sent the Republic’s Attorney General a letter with information that may reopen the “Maddie case” process.

Although he declined to reveal the contents of this letter, he advanced that there is something “very important” concerning the cuddle cat (Maddie’s soft toy, that Kate often carried with her during her media appearances), an object which, as has been made public, was positively signalled with cadaver odour by the sniffer dogs. Together with “Maddie’s blanket”, the pink soft toy may be a starting point to reopen the process “at a time when, apart from an attempt to silence Gonçalo Amaral, through an injunction against his book ‘The Truth about the Lie’, a shameful picture of an attack on the family of the former inspector, by the British media, is starting to emerge”, the psychologist told Semanário Privado.

source: Semanário Privado, paper edition, 16.09.2009

by astro

Now now Amaralol, you know perfectly well that you are telling porkies again and embellishing.

Now be reasonable, how on earth would it be possible for a psychologist who has NEVER met the parents, never had anything to do with them, possibly know something about cuddle cat?

And aren't you clutching at straws? wasn't this first written by that other arch fantasist Docmac? Now here it is all twisted about into something else? See Amaralol, you are dealing with people with brains and memories here and what is more we are NOT scared of you! Fatty, fatty.

Rosiepops wrote:

One of the new facts that have already been revealed by our newspaper – and that was also mentioned during the McCanns’ interview with Oprah Winfrey – concerns a blanket that disappeared from the Ocean Club and that, allegedly, was used as a shroud during a funeral. Could that be one of the worries for those who persist in preventing the discovery of the entire truth about what happened to little Maddie?

I’ll explain: this child, like so many others of her age, slept with a certain blanket and with a certain soft toy. During that interview that you mention, the interviewer spoke to the mother, saying that she knew about her concern in knowing if the abductor covered her with “her blanket”. So far, nothing much. Now notice this, the blanket was left behind when the disappearance happened. There is documentation that proves that it was not taken with her, and there is no known testimony saying that it was seen when she was being carried away in a man’s arms.
What is being asked is the following: Was this a gaffe by the interviewer? Was “her blanket” the one that was left behind? How did “her blanket” go back to the child? These are the questions that need an answer and at the very least, they may indicate that there is something wrong.

Would this be the same pink blanket which was pictured on Madeleine's bed after she was abducted? The same one that *YOU* lost? (accidentally on purpose?) You tell us Amaral, how did the blanket go back to the child, MORE you numbskull, how do you KNOW it went back to the child? I heard Kate McCann talking about a blanket to keep her warm and comforted, she did NOT mention this blanket, the one *YOU LOST*.

Is there any other fact in the process that should be investigated further?

Yes. To find out why the soft toy that the little girl used the most – and that was later used by Kate McCann in all of her public appearances – was washed before the sniffer dogs, that are experts in detecting cadaver odour, arrived in Portugal.

Amaralol you had 71 days that is SEVENTY ONE DAYS, with which to have cuddle cat forensically examined (again), it was YOUR investigation why didn't YOU seize it before? Surely you could have arranged this between your lunches and tea breaks, with former Portuguese F1 racing drivers and driving to pick up you daughter after drinking heavily for hours? Come on now, you could have at least done some work!


Attorney General receives information that may reopen the Maddie case

We have been informed that psychologist Paulo Sargento, a regular commentator of the Maddie case on television, has sent the Republic’s Attorney General a letter with information that may reopen the “Maddie case” process.

Although he declined to reveal the contents of this letter, he advanced that there is something “very important” concerning the cuddle cat (Maddie’s soft toy, that Kate often carried with her during her media appearances), an object which, as has been made public, was positively signalled with cadaver odour by the sniffer dogs. Together with “Maddie’s blanket”, the pink soft toy may be a starting point to reopen the process “at a time when, apart from an attempt to silence Gonçalo Amaral, through an injunction against his book ‘The Truth about the Lie’, a shameful picture of an attack on the family of the former inspector, by the British media, is starting to emerge”, the psychologist told Semanário Privado.

source: Semanário Privado, paper edition, 16.09.2009

by astro

Now now Amaralol, you know perfectly well that you are telling porkies again and embellishing.

Now be reasonable, how on earth would it be possible for a psychologist who has NEVER met the parents, never had anything to do with them, possibly know something about cuddle cat?

And aren't you clutching at straws? wasn't this first written by that other arch fantasist Docmac? Now here it is all twisted about into something else? See Amaralol, you are dealing with people with brains and memories here and what is more we are NOT scared of you! Fatty, fatty.

[url=http://www.pfa2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3706

maria wrote:Small note: Paulo Sargento is (?) a psychologist specialised on everything, from commenting on a computer reconstruction aimed at proving that Madeleine could not have been abducted all the way to the effects of flu A (swine flu) on small kids (psychologically speaking of course). I haven't seen on our tv a dumber guy, honestly.