For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

by Rosie Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:04 am

Lets get this straight once and for all, stop being disingenuous.

You keep on about the dogs not being wrong in 200 cases.

Yes actually they were - Jersey - coconuts. HOWEVER, that aside, you conveniently forget to mention that these dogs are SEEK AND FIND dogs, this means they seek and find BODIES and neither Eddie or Keela, have sought and found 200 places that dead bodies had been briefly stored THREE MONTHS BEFORE, before being moved and prior to being sniffed out by them. And another thing antisrmorons

both those dogs were Spaniels, they were NOT Bloodhounds, as you MISQUOTED. Idiot.

It means that these two dogs, sought and found actual bodies, either buried alive or buried under rubble, or lost or whatever, that means the bodies were still there in situ when the dogs found them, in the majority of of cases (if not all of them) so stop your deliberate misleading of people. Bennett is such a liar! Pinnochio

by dianeh Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:41 am

Yes, Rosie, you are right.

Bennett continues to make claims that are ridiculous. Grimes has said that the dogs indications must be substantiated by forensics, that they cannot be taken alone. Grimes has never claimed that his dogs are never wrong. He has never made the claims that Bennett makes.

So are we to believe the expert in this field (Grimes) or Bennett?

by Rosie Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:20 pm

Diane, he does not want to believe what Grimes has said and written, what Bennett wants to believe, is actually "what Bennett 'wants' to believe" and rather than believe what Grimes has said, he chooses to believe Amaral, a convicted liar, and his book of lies. He refuses to believe what Grimes wrote because this is not what he wants to believe, if he did believe Grimes then on this one very small point of truth, his whole tissue of lies totally disintegrates and comes crashing down! It proves there is not any substance at all to what he says and has written!

by dianeh Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:39 pm

It continues to amaze me that anyone can think the dogs infallible, and that their indications prove that Madeleine was killed in the apartment and then moved in the car. Grimes makes it clear that without forensics to back it up, the dogs indications mean nothing. Yet again, and again, Bennett and his weak minded followers continue to use this as the 'proof' that Madeleine died in the apartment. As mr Grimes knows, there are a number of things that can cause the dogs it indicate, he even includes one in his report, being contamination of the scene. That is why forensics are needed, to rule out contamination, or the scent of death from a different body etc. It is just plain common sense.

Seems common sense is in short supply over there in Missing Madeleine land.

by Rosie Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:23 pm

Diane, there is more that common sense missing in "MM Land", most of the posters are away with the fairies. But to give some of them their due, they take Bennett on and show the moron up for the twerp he actually is, they keep asking him questions which he either ignores, or answers with other questions, so none of the questions are answered.

by Sponsored content

For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

Re: For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

Diane

Re: For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

Re: For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)

Re: For Bennett Re Dogs (Autoglass Repair - Autoglass Replace)